in article catgno$r9h$2@news.Stanford.EDU, mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net at
mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote on 6/18/04 10:32 AM:

> Ernest Schaal <eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote:
>> in article catdpi$o00$4@news.Stanford.EDU, mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net at
>> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote on 6/18/04 9:42 AM:
> 
>>> Ernest Schaal <eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote:
>>>> in article cas6gj$n4e$2@news.Stanford.EDU, mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net at
>>>> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote on 6/17/04 10:32 PM:
>>> 
>>>>> Sorry, did you not understand "a disproporionate cut to the very rich"?
>>> 
>>>> I can guess at what you meant, but it would only be a guess.
>>> 
>>> Did you even LOOK at the reference provided?
> 
>> I looked at your message. That should have been enough if your message was
>> clearly written.
> 
> I see; so you skipped all the posts where I included links to data, and
> those I posted parts of the data, jumped in the middle of the
> discussion, and it is someone else's fault you do not understand.
> 
> Yes, one sees that immediately.
> 
> Mike

I had read the parts where you had posted data, and I commented on them.
Unfortunately, for you your own data didn't support your own conclusions.