On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 00:23:27 +0000 (UTC), mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net
brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:

>Michael Cash <mikecash@buggerallspammers.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:29:32 +0900, Eric Takabayashi
>> <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
>
>>>necoandjeff wrote:
>>>
>>>> > Is likelihood enough reason to demand a man pay millions of dollars?
>>>> > No, he was "found" liable.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, in fact it is. It is called preponderence of the evidence.
>>>
>>>Then why can you not accept that he was "found" *liable*, and deserves to
>>>pay, instead of being more likely than not?
>
>> "preponderance of evidence" as opposed to "beyond a reasonable doubt".
>
>None of which implies 'blameless', yes?

None of which implies "blameless", yes.






--

Michael Cash

"I am sorry, Mr. Cash, but we are unable to accept your rap sheet in lieu of
a high school transcript."

                                Dr. Howard Sprague
                                Dean of Admissions
                                Mount Pilot College