necoandjeff wrote:

> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
> > Kevin Gowen <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:
> >> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
> >>> Kevin Gowen <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Of course he is legally blameless. That is different from saying,
> >>>> "He did not perjure himself" OJ Simpson is legally blameless.
> >>>
> >>>
> > I bet OJ has a yummy cock.
> >
> >> Whoa!
> >
> > If you say so, and you did.
> >
> > However, the civil found him NOT to be blameless.
>
> The civil found him more likely than not to be to blame.

Is likelihood enough reason to demand a man pay millions of dollars? No,
he was "found" liable.

> There is no absolute.

Except whether he did it or not.

--
 "I'm on top of the world right now, because everyone's going to know
that I can shove more than three burgers in my mouth!"