Michael Cash <mikecash@buggerallspammers.com> wrote in message news:<tvs9i0pjenlm17s19u1qvheoe7vjo33akh@4ax.com>...
> On 19 Aug 2004 08:19:15 -0700, worthj1970@yahoo.com (John W.) brought
> down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
> 
> >Michael Cash <mikecash@buggerallspammers.com> wrote in message news:<vuu8i01vueeshg8j4p19ghad1f7vd5khh5@4ax.com>...
> >> 
> >> I wonder if anyone would like to speculate, based on their perceptions
> >> of pre-rehab Rush, the nature of his comments on New Jersey Governor
> >> McGreevey announcing that he is gay.
> >> 
> >Since the guy was a republican I'd say Rush was torn, but leaned
> >towards saying the man's sexuality shouldn't be a big issue, instead
> >saying it's a Democratic plot of some sort. Aren't the Dems
> >(predictably, as they should be expected to do) clammoring for
> >McGreevey's resignation now in hopes of putting their own guy in the
> >office? I imagine Rush would rather have a Gay man who cheated on his
> >wife -- but is Republican -- in office than a Democrat.
> 
> Bingo.
> 
> Now add "homophobe" to one of the charges against him I see evidence
> against.
> 
Actually it doesn't do anything to change my opinion of him; lowers
it, actually, because he'd rather be a Republican than anything else.
Partisan politics -- and those that believe in it so strongly that
they'll put aside all other moral beliefs -- really bothers me.

John W.