Michael Cash schrieb:
> 
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:22:43 +0200, Silvio Franke
> <silvio.franke@unibw-muenchen.de> belched the alphabet and kept on
> going with:
> 
> >
> >
> >Michael Cash schrieb:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 07:18:01 +0200, Silvio Franke
> >> <silvio.franke@unibw-muenchen.de> belched the alphabet and kept on
> >> going with:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Michael Cash schrieb:
> 
> >> No problem. Just don't look for me when the shooting starts. (I'll be
> >> back at HQ, under a desk).
> >
> >Oh Mike... What do you think is more interesting for the enemy? The
> >poor little OLt Franke with his lousy 4 tanks or the HQ?
> 
> Poor little OLt Franke and his 4 lousy tanks will draw more fire.

..and is able to fire back, while driving 50mph and sitting behind 
70-100cm Chobham and composite armour. Never seen a HQ doing this.

> >Something tells me, that it can be far more dangerous in a HQ, than in
> >a tank...
> 
> Nobody in their right mind would fire on HQ. HQ is a place you want to
> capture undamaged. Know why? That's where the coffee and donuts are.
> Safer than in your mother's arms, Silvio.

No, the donuts are directly in my NBC-protection device in the tank. 
There is allways enough place there for some beers, extra food...and the 
coffee is at the loaders side, besides the rounds for the machine guns. 

I heard some weird Generals allways try to eliminate the enemy's 
control and command structures first, by using big bombs and 
missiles and some other dirty things.

Silvio
-------------------------------------------------
Sometimes I feel the strong urge to march east...