"Ken" <dvdfan9@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c5fec6f.0306160731.73119f38@posting.google.com...

> In Japan, it could be considered as a "koumu shikkou bougai"

No, you are wrong as usual. She has just slapped the cop, was not
obstructing any of his police duty. This kind of case is a typical
false charge caused by arrogant and outrageous Tokyo kind police.
However, in Japan that has the less fair police as someone says, and I
agree with it, police unjustly distort and insist the act of slap as
"obstruction".

In this case, the cop was illegally interfering with her and he was
illegally grabbing her arm before she slapped the cop. The cops and
the owner of the honorary white Tokyoite's super high-class parking
lot had no legal right to interfere with her after she apologized
about her occupation of his super high-class honorary white's parking
lot, but they illegally obstructed her to move. So the cop who had
grabbed her arm, and the honorary white Tokyoite who illegally
obstructed her to move from there are exactly the violation.

Nevertheless, she shouldn't have slapped the cop. She should be
accused as a simple outrage against police but since police had
grabbed her arm before she slapped him, it shouldn't be accused. The
worst one is the honorary white Tokyoite. He should be accused as
illegal call to police. Actually occupying someone's parking lot
without any permission is not any violation. It's just a private
trouble and he had no right to call police. So she can accuse him as
defamation of character. Also the Tokyoite should be accused as
obstruction of her traffic.