kaz@ivebeenframed.com (Kaz) wrote in message news:<365fcc52.0306160903.72bd16f9@posting.google.com>...
> "Ken" <dvdfan9@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c5fec6f.0306160731.73119f38@posting.google.com...
> 
> > In Japan, it could be considered as a "koumu shikkou bougai"
> 
> No, you are wrong as usual. She has just slapped the cop, was not
> obstructing any of his police duty. This kind of case is a typical
> false charge caused by arrogant and outrageous Tokyo kind police.
> However, in Japan that has the less fair police as someone says, and I
> agree with it, police unjustly distort and insist the act of slap as
> "obstruction".
> 
> In this case, the cop was illegally interfering with her and he was
> illegally grabbing her arm before she slapped the cop. The cops and
> the owner of the honorary white Tokyoite's super high-class parking
> lot had no legal right to interfere with her after she apologized
> about her occupation of his super high-class honorary white's parking
> lot, but they illegally obstructed her to move. So the cop who had
> grabbed her arm, and the honorary white Tokyoite who illegally
> obstructed her to move from there are exactly the violation.
> 
> Nevertheless, she shouldn't have slapped the cop. She should be
> accused as a simple outrage against police but since police had
> grabbed her arm before she slapped him, it shouldn't be accused. The
> worst one is the honorary white Tokyoite. He should be accused as
> illegal call to police. Actually occupying someone's parking lot
> without any permission is not any violation. It's just a private
> trouble and he had no right to call police. So she can accuse him as
> defamation of character. Also the Tokyoite should be accused as
> obstruction of her traffic.


I realize that logic isn't your first language, but Jeezus! can't you
ever write something that comes close to making sense?