Michael Cash wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:25:29 +0900, Raj Feridun
> <rferid@NOSPAMyahoo.co.jp> brought down from the Mount tablets
> inscribed:
> 
> 
>>On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:57:48 +0900, Michael Cash
>><mikecash@buggerallspammers.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>If you think the governor provided the ballots, it really makes me
>>>question your statement about GW providing the mail-in prayer cards. 
>>
>>Sorry to burst your bubble,
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/8jqu
>>
>>
>>
>>>>Plus what difference do they make when the US Supreme Court has
>>>>already set the precedent of a royal appointment?
>>
>>>In what way did they set a precedent for a royal appointment? By
>>>telling the Florida Supreme Court that they have to apply the laws
>>>that are in effect at the time of the election and not change the
>>>rules midstream? Goodness, that was heavy-handed of them.
>>
>>By disallowing a recount, duh.
> 
> 
> So you think it's alright for a court to change the law right in the
> middle of the process?
> 
> And didn't several journalistic recounts well into 2001, no matter how
> they counted, still show that Gore did NOT win Florida?

Yes. There were two methods that would have given a Gore victory. Gore 
never asked for a recount via these two methods.

- Kevin