"John W." <worthj1970@yahoo.com> wrote ..
> ggull wrote:
> > (B) I'm not saying 'retouch' as in alter (that's another argument
> :-), but
> > 'restore' to the original quality.  Maybe with some judicious
> improvement to
> > what one hopes the director would have done with decent cameras,
> film, but
> > mostly to correct degradation.
>
> I agree with that. I saw a special awhile back about the difficulties
> film restorers face. It was fascinating.

That sounds interesting.  Any recollection of where you saw it, maybe even a
title?  I'd like to keep an eye out for a rerun.