Re: Star Trek is DEAD!!!
On Fri, 01 May 2009 08:56:22 GMT, David Johnston <david@block.net>
wrote:
>On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:04:03 -0400, Merrick Baldelli
><mbaldelli@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:07:14 -0700 (PDT), Traveler
>><qwrtz123@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Unfortunatly I have to agree with you. Trek doesn't need a new movie,
>>>it needs a serious series set ~100 years after TNG.
>>
>> I don't think we could see the Prime Directive murdered any
>>more than it always has been. 100 years into the future you say?
>>What will the Prime Suggestion be then? The Prime Satire?
>
>Given the trend in the franchise, by that point it would be reasonable
>to think that the Prime Directive would have evolved into a total
>refusal to make contact with any alien species.
*laughing* Star Trek: The Isolationist Generation.
I think that's rather catchy.
--
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_( (_ , '_ * . Merrick Baldelli
(((\ \> /_1 `
(\\\\ \_/ /
-=-\ /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
\ _/ Who are these folks and why have they
/ / stopped taking their medication?
- Captain Infinity
Fnews-brouse 1.9(20180406) -- by Mizuno, MWE <mwe@ccsf.jp>
GnuPG Key ID = ECC8A735
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 9BE6 B9E9 55A5 A499 CD51 946E 9BDC 7870 ECC8 A735