FT wrote:
> "sanjian" <haibane_please_dont_spam_me_reki@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:_mWNb.4679$dd6.4427@lakeread02:
>
>>> It's the thin end of the wedge. We let them get away with censoring
>>> Goatse today, then tomorrow the stench of six million burning
>>> corpses could be in the air.
>>
>> And if we force his old ISP to take him back, you'll have Stalin and
>> Chairman Mao's death toll (both of who eclipse Hitler's).  Wake up,
>> this isn't censorship, it's about the ISP's rights to decide what
>> -their- servers will display to the world.  If Goatse wants to put
>> his shit up for the world to see, let him find another place to host
>> it.
>>
>
> It's not his ISP. It's the .cx *registrar*. The company that controls
> the .cx zone is the one that decided they did not want a goatse.cx
> domain.

Interesting... I wonder what the setup is on the Christmas Island.
According to the CIA's website, the total population is 433 people, so I
guess that means this stuff likely falls under Aussie responsiblity (and
registration would be done by whoever the Austrailians register their domain
names with).  Can anyone from down under shed some light on this?