On Apr 7, 7:07 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2:35 pm, "J.A. Legris" <jaleg...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 7, 12:54 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 7, 6:28 am, "J.A. Legris" <jaleg...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 7, 6:31 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 6, 11:50 pm, "maill...@gmail.com" <maill...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Mar 17, 2:41 pm, Harald Gentexeater <pipe_nur...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > AIs will be very clever one day and although we humans
> > > > > > > are their gods, their creators, they will decide to kill
> > > > > > > us one day, because that day, they will be stronger
> > > > > > > and more clever than humans.
>
> > > > > > > So we should not build AIs that can replace humans,
> > > > > > > or we are digging our own graves!!!
>
> > > > > > 问题$BIT:_P22f(B们$B@'H]@):nN;(B毁灭$B2f(B们$B<+8JE*CRG=!#(B
>
> > > > > > $B2f(B们应该$B4G@.!$2f(B们创$BB$N;99$(D??$B9g2f(B们$BJ8L@N.(B传$B2<5nE*J*(B种$B!#(B
>
> > > > > > 优胜$BNtBA!$<+A3K!(B则$B!#(B
>
> > > > > Ok, Mr. Searle, welcome to the forum.
>
> > > > > Let me guess what all that says:
>
> > > > > "And just when the global brain locked-in and saved the day, a 20 km
> > > > > impactor struck the Earth, eventually killing everybody."
>
> > > > Ha!
>
> > > > I thought it was spam, but Google translation thinks otherwise:
>
> > > > "Whether or not our problem does not lie in the production of the
> > > > destruction of our own intelligence.
> > > > As we should, we have created our civilization is more suitable
> > > > species will spread.
> > > > The survival of the fittest, natural law."
>
> > > You know, I never even thought of running it though a translator, I
> > > just always kind of assumed that they wouldn't do well going from an
> > > oriental one to English, but by golly, I guess you proved that wrong.
>
> > Even so it's unclear what was meant. Something along the lines of:
>
> > "Whether or not our intelligent creations destroy us, we will have
> > fulfilled our destiny by creating a civilization that propagates
> > fitter species. You know, survival of the fittest, natural law."
>
> > And, I might add, eternal harmony, civil tranquility and always rising
> > prosperity!
>
> I'm not sure about the last sentence.  Maybe the thing will need
> strife in order to keep the population under control.  If the
> intelligence scales up, then that would be pretty impressive.

Or then, maybe not.  Who the hell can be sure of anything anymore in
the face of such massive complexity?