On Apr 7, 2:35 pm, "J.A. Legris" <jaleg...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> On Apr 7, 12:54 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 7, 6:28 am, "J.A. Legris" <jaleg...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 7, 6:31 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 6, 11:50 pm, "maill...@gmail.com" <maill...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Mar 17, 2:41 pm, Harald Gentexeater <pipe_nur...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > AIs will be very clever one day and although we humans
> > > > > > are their gods, their creators, they will decide to kill
> > > > > > us one day, because that day, they will be stronger
> > > > > > and more clever than humans.
>
> > > > > > So we should not build AIs that can replace humans,
> > > > > > or we are digging our own graves!!!
>
> > > > > 问题$BIT:_P22f(B们$B@'H]@):nN;(B毁灭$B2f(B们$B<+8JE*CRG=!#(B
>
> > > > > $B2f(B们应该$B4G@.!$2f(B们创$BB$N;99$(D??$B9g2f(B们$BJ8L@N.(B传$B2<5nE*J*(B种$B!#(B
>
> > > > > 优胜$BNtBA!$<+A3K!(B则$B!#(B
>
> > > > Ok, Mr. Searle, welcome to the forum.
>
> > > > Let me guess what all that says:
>
> > > > "And just when the global brain locked-in and saved the day, a 20 km
> > > > impactor struck the Earth, eventually killing everybody."
>
> > > Ha!
>
> > > I thought it was spam, but Google translation thinks otherwise:
>
> > > "Whether or not our problem does not lie in the production of the
> > > destruction of our own intelligence.
> > > As we should, we have created our civilization is more suitable
> > > species will spread.
> > > The survival of the fittest, natural law."
>
> > You know, I never even thought of running it though a translator, I
> > just always kind of assumed that they wouldn't do well going from an
> > oriental one to English, but by golly, I guess you proved that wrong.
>
> Even so it's unclear what was meant. Something along the lines of:
>
> "Whether or not our intelligent creations destroy us, we will have
> fulfilled our destiny by creating a civilization that propagates
> fitter species. You know, survival of the fittest, natural law."
>
> And, I might add, eternal harmony, civil tranquility and always rising
> prosperity!

I'm not sure about the last sentence.  Maybe the thing will need
strife in order to keep the population under control.  If the
intelligence scales up, then that would be pretty impressive.