Re: Gifu
necoandjeff wrote:
> Ron Hitler Barrassi wrote:
>
>>necoandjeff wrote:
>>
>>>Ron Hitler Barrassi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>(do you want to go over Bernoulli again?)
>>>
>>>
>>>Sure, we could go over it again if you're still having trouble. But
>>>first I want you to assure me that you have actually performed your
>>>little paper airfoil experiment and confirmed that it does not
>>>behave at all the way you suggested it should.
>>>
>>
>>Memory seems to be one of your most serious issues. I told *you*
>>to do the experiment and I told *you* to make sure you only blow
>>across the top surface. I also provided a detailed explanation
>>that it was change in momentum NOT Bernoulli that was responsible
>>for lift.
>
>
> Looks like you're the one in need of a memory aid, but I have one for you.
> Here:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6vw6o
>
I was mistaken. Stupidity is your biggest problem. From the link
you gave me.
Jan 6, 4:06 am
"Bernoulli principle. The primary advantage of this
description is that it is easy to understand and has been taught
for many years. Because of it’s *simplicity*, it is used to
describe lift in most flight training manuals. The major
disadvantage is that it relies on the "principle of equal transit
times" which is *wrong*"
Pilots are obviously not gifted students.
"The third description, which we are advocating here, we will
call the Physical Description of lift. This description is based
primarily on Newton’s laws. "
Change of momentum. Seems you didn't respond to that post. I hope
we won't hear anymore attempts at science from you.
Fnews-brouse 1.9(20180406) -- by Mizuno, MWE <mwe@ccsf.jp>
GnuPG Key ID = ECC8A735
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 9BE6 B9E9 55A5 A499 CD51 946E 9BDC 7870 ECC8 A735