necoandjeff wrote:
> Ron Hitler Barrassi wrote:
> 
>>necoandjeff wrote:
>>
>>>Ron Hitler Barrassi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>(do you want to go over Bernoulli again?)
>>>
>>>
>>>Sure, we could go over it again if you're still having trouble. But
>>>first I want you to assure me that you have actually performed your
>>>little paper airfoil experiment and confirmed that it does not
>>>behave at all the way you suggested it should.
>>>
>>
>>Memory seems to be one of your most serious issues. I told *you*
>>to do the experiment and I told *you* to make sure you only blow
>>across the top surface. I also provided a detailed explanation
>>that it was change in momentum NOT Bernoulli that was responsible
>>for lift.
> 
> 
> Looks like you're the one in need of a memory aid, but I have one for you.
> Here:
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/6vw6o
> 

I was mistaken. Stupidity is your biggest problem. From the link 
you gave me.

Jan 6, 4:06 am
"Bernoulli principle. The primary advantage of this
description is that it is easy to understand and has been taught 
for many years. Because of it’s *simplicity*, it is used to 
describe lift in most flight training manuals. The major 
disadvantage is that it relies on the "principle of equal transit 
times" which is *wrong*"

Pilots are obviously not gifted students.

"The third description, which we are advocating here, we will 
call the Physical Description of lift. This description is based 
primarily on Newton’s laws. "

Change of momentum. Seems you didn't respond to that post. I hope 
we won't hear anymore attempts at science from you.