"USA" <USA@aol.com> wrote in
news:Hv0Ma.1980$Mr2.1871@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com: 

> 
> "USA" <USA@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:7s0Ma.1979$GG2.1363@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> "Kay" <nospam@nos.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns93AA7F1D2F2AFnospamnoscom@207.225.159.6...
>> > "USA" <USA@aol.com> wrote in
>> > news:M1YLa.415$KJ4.39@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > "Kay" <nospam@nos.com> wrote in message
>> > > news:Xns93A9AFCC68725nospamnoscom@207.225.159.7...
>> > >> "min10011" <min10011@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> > >> news:D8iHa.145708$h42.62127@twister.nyc.rr.com:
>> > >>
>> > >> > That is so true.  Matsuda's selective documentation is as
>> > >> > specious as the ones that the PRC produces to declare that
>> > >> > more than 30 million Chinese died during the Japanese
>> > >> > occupation.  He has conjured up a little fantasy that Japan
>> > >> > had committed no wrong and indeed had noble intentions.  The
>> > >> > idiotic likes of USA@aol.com buy into the fantasy until they
>> > >> > hear that the attack on Pearl Harbor was a justified
>> > >> > "pre-emptive" strike. 
>> > >>
>> > > Oh I'm sorry Kay...I missed this one. You know, you keep
>> > > attacking me posts all over the place
>> > > including ones in which I am not a participant, so it's really
>> > > hard to keep tabs on all the bad-mouthing
>> > > of me that you are doing.
>> > > I have NEVER said that Japan comitted no wrongs. Doesn't the fact
>> > > that I have been arguing that
>> > > the Japanese killed more Chinese people than Koreans PROVE that
>> > > point???? Or do you, like grunt, believe that Chinese people are
>> > > not worthy of being counted as people???
>> > > And now that you bring it up, yes the Pearl Horbor attack was
>> > > justified from te viewpoint of the
>> > > Japanese, but not from our (AMerican) point of view.
>> > > I suppose you are going to re-write/paraphrase this into
>> > > something completely different now
>> > > since that's what you do being the retarded monkey that you are.
>> >
>> > Dear, dear, dear USA, as usual, you are proving
>> > you have reading impediment problem and barking
>> > at a wrong tree.
>> >
>> > If you know how to read, you would notice that the
>> > the post you are so mad about is by min10011, not
>> > Kay.  Can you tell the difference between "kay" and
>> > "min?"  "Kay" starts with a letter K; "min" starts
>> > with "m."
>> >
>> > Do I expect an apology from you?  There is a "first
>> > time" in everything.  (DWS)
>> >
>> > Or, will I get another truck-load of profanity for
>> > telling you the truth?
>> >
>> You are right. I made an error. It was indeed min1011 who wrote:
>> "The idiotic likes of USA@aol.com buy
>> into the fantasy until they hear that the attack on Pearl Harbor
>> was a justified "pre-emptive" strike."
>> It was not you.
>> I Apologize.
>>
> 
> Actually...after reading this scarcastic part:
>> > If you know how to read, you would notice that the
>> > the post you are so mad about is by min10011, not
>> > Kay.  Can you tell the difference between "kay" and
>> > "min?"  "Kay" starts with a letter K; "min" starts
>> > with "m."
> Fuck you Kay.

Kind of slow, eh?

By the way, "Fuck" starts with an "F." Just trying
to be of help.