"Kevin Gowen" <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote in message
news:2p4i0dFgnl9cU5@uni-berlin.de...
> necoandjeff wrote:
>
> > "Kevin Gowen" <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:2p4e6cFgnl9cU2@uni-berlin.de...
> >
> >>mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>>Like, say, the McMartin case?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>In any case, but of course I am referring to cases in which the
> >
> > claimant was the
> >
> >>>>>>victim.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>So, you're not interested rights of the victim,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>In the case of false accusation, the only situation you seem to care
> >
> > about, yes, the
> >
> >>>
> >>>No, but it IS *a* situation the founding fathers cared very much about.
> >>>
> >>>Again, which specific parts of the Constitution do you object to?
> >>
> >>The 16th.
> >
> >
> > The 2nd.
>
> That's the amendment that ensures that you have all the others.

If you buy that nonsense, I've got some land in Florida I'd like to sell
you...