necoandjeff wrote:

> "Kevin Gowen" <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2p4e6cFgnl9cU2@uni-berlin.de...
> 
>>mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>Like, say, the McMartin case?
>>>>>
>>>>>>In any case, but of course I am referring to cases in which the
> 
> claimant was the
> 
>>>>>>victim.
>>>>>
>>>>>So, you're not interested rights of the victim,
>>>
>>>
>>>>In the case of false accusation, the only situation you seem to care
> 
> about, yes, the
> 
>>>
>>>No, but it IS *a* situation the founding fathers cared very much about.
>>>
>>>Again, which specific parts of the Constitution do you object to?
>>
>>The 16th.
> 
> 
> The 2nd.

That's the amendment that ensures that you have all the others.

- Kevin