"Michael Cash" <mikecash@sunfield.ne.jp> wrote in message
news:ffboov0h87vp3grm35pb2nhshm9hefo1q9@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:54:49 -0700, "Bryce"
> <fukuzzz@takethisout.hotmail.com> belched the alphabet and kept on
> going with:
>
> >
> >"Michael Cash" <mikecash@sunfield.ne.jp> wrote in message
> >news:ucmnovgipjirrnuqtr9eng09a0ecsuj6vi@4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:45:51 -0700, "Bryce"
> >> <fukuzzz@takethisout.hotmail.com> belched the alphabet and kept on
> >> going with:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"Dave Fossett" <reply@via.newsgroup> wrote in message
> >> >news:1KGib.327$l63.145@news1.dion.ne.jp...
> >> >> "Bryce" <fukuzzz@takethisout.hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > There's 2!
> >> >>
> >> >> But I thought you were looking for *fans*.
> >> >> I expect even most of us Japan-newbies have at least heard of them.
> >> >> Personally I wouldn't know what they sound or look like, but it is
not
> >> >hard
> >> >> to guess.
> >> >>
> >> >> -- 
> >> >> Dave Fossett
> >> >> Saitama, Japan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >wow.
> >> >
> >>
> >> In case you hadn't figured it out yet, Bryce, we're all sufficiently
> >> impressed with what a crusty old-timer you are. You can quit trying so
> >> hard. Time for the pony to learn a new trick already.
> >>
> >
> >
> >I don't see why you keep looking at it on those terms.
>
> Normally, we don't. It's the one sort of boorishness we consider
> beneath even us. And as low as our standards are, that's saying
> something.
>
> >It seems like some of
> >you guys are in the shower looking at bigger guy's sausages are
something.
> >Give it a break already.
>
> Yes, Mr. Pott.
>
> Perhaps it has escaped your notice that the others weren't gleefully
> excoriating each other for (perceived) newbieness when you climbed
> into the sandbox with us. You're the one who jumped in with both feet
> whipping your old-timer wienie around for all to worship and admire.
>
> Unfortunately, Bryce, that really doesn't mean shit around here. My
> personal opinion is that the amount of time a person has been in Japan
> is a reliable indicator of one thing and one thing only: the amount of
> time a person has been in Japan. If it makes you happy, that you were
> here in the 80s has been duly noted and recorded. But in a group where
> not only were a lot of us here *in* the 80s but have been here pretty
> much constantly *since* the 80s (or before?), that fact that you began
> your bouncing in and out of the place back then really doesn't count
> for much.
>
> Those who actually *have* been here for entirely too long, have long
> ago figured out that it really doesn't signify anything and in itself
> is deserving of no particular awe from anyone. Being proud of having
> been in Japan longer than others is sort of like being proud of being
> the tallest kid in the second grade. It isn't an accomplishment; stay
> in the second grade long enough and anybody can do it.
>
> Consequently, putting others down for not having been here as long as
> one's self is boorish, insecure, locker room wienie wagging. You come
> in here swaggering about as though you think you must have a kielbasa
> slapping from thigh-to-thigh, the THWAP!s echoing off the tile of the
> fjlij shower walls, yet the content of what you say leaves us
> scratching our heads and wondering why the guy with the cocktail frank
> is vigorously shaking his crotch in our faces.
>
> It's nice to have you with us, Bryce. You spice the place up. You're a
> colorful and engaging guy. But let's quit putting down others for not
> having gotten here when you did. I'm sure if the other parties had
> known they were in a race, they would have tried to get here sooner.
>


And what the fuck does the B's have to do with being in Japan for a long
time?

This isn't a drug group is it?

>
>