Eric Takabayashi wrote:
> Eric Takabayashi wrote:
>
>> Rykk wrote:
>>
snip

> The Constitution does not (edit) give  "convicted" sex offenders the right 
> to
> privacy, even not to have their pictures, addresses (or in Hawaii,
> also place of work) online.
>
> Your comment? Are you going to call the Supreme Court wrong, in
> addition to any state practices you already claimed are wrong?

I'm an American citizen.  As I have the rights to free speech, I can proudly 
proclaim my opinion that the Supreme Court as being "wrong" Also, as I am an 
American citizen, I need not worry about some State official knocking on my 
door tomarrow.  I think that for the Supreme Court to be "right" then they 
should revoke a convicts citizenship, not give a "special" reduced 
citizenship status.

>
>> You prove a sex offender is not a criminal

I never said that.  Why should I prove it?

Rykk