mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:

> Eric Takabayashi <etakajp@yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> > necoandjeff wrote:
>
> >> No, it does not.
>
> > I see. So him being a sort of social outcast and liable for millions even with
> > the possibility of being completely innocent (ie did not do it) does not bother
> > you.
>
> So, he should NOT be liable for millions?

He should pay for being responsible for the deaths of two people if he killed them.

I don't care that he is made to pay millions for abusing his wife in life.

> >> It means the best that our sytem could do was determine
> >> that he was somewhere between 50 and 99% likely to have committed the
> >> crimes. I don't really care to subsitute my judgment for that of two juries.
>
> > I hope you feel the same if ever subject to the flawed US legal system.
>
> Why do you always presume that anyone who disagrees with you MUST NOT
> EVER have been "the victim" of the flawed US legal system?

Because someone who is wrongly jailed or executed for murder, or made to pay
millions of dollars, or watches a killer go free, might have a different opinion of
being "found" anything.

--
 "I'm on top of the world right now, because everyone's going to know that I can
shove more than three burgers in my mouth!"