On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 21:12:43 -0500, Kevin Gowen
<kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:

>> No, I think one is declared innocent of the crimes once they've been
>> acquitted.

>You think wrong. Nothing of the kind is declared. There is a very good 
>reason why the verdict is "not guilty" rather than "innocent".

It means Clinton is declared not guilty of the specific offenses for
which he was charged. He is legally blameless. Spin it all you like.

Raj