"John Yamamoto-Wilson" <j-yamamo@sophia.ac.jp> wrote in message news:<batbfa$3c27i$1@ID-169501.news.dfncis.de>...
> OK, my *final* word (promise ya, soc.hist!).
> 
> > Accorfing to your theory, calling someone as "crude" is an offensive
> > drivel isn't it?
> 
> No. *This* is subhuman drivel:

So, according to your theory defining that a racist who call someone
subhuman is subhuman, your comment is subhuman drivel.

> > > ugly retarded barbarians
> > > former slaves who have a lot of ugly hatred
> > > deformed Hun-gooks
> > > stinking Hun-gook
> > > gook barbarians
> > > primitive beast with a full of hatred and inferiority complex
> > > you Hun-gook land should be punished.
> 
> Calling it crude is fair comment (not to mention bleeding obvious). If you
> don't believe me, show it to your mother and see what she calls it.

No, it's a negative word and aggressive. It's only fair to subhuman
like you.

> > Tokyojaps, the honorary whites  are really offensive and aggressive to
> > us. I can't do nothing about that. It's not our fault but their own.
> > They are scornfully calling me and Kansai-jin as Chon(Koreans), and
> > severely despising us, so I have morally right to despise them. If
> > they ever stop insulting us, I will stop calling them so.
> 
> Get real, Kaz. I've lived in and around Tokyo for years, with friends from
> all different parts of Japan. The only time I ever heard the word Chon was
> you using it in this newsgroup (fjlij).

All those tokyojaps in fj.soc.politics have been calling me as "chon"
for years though.

> > But surely you hurted me, so it's sarcasm.
> 
> Oh, did I hurt you? And you were being so kind and thoughtful and
> considerate to everyone, weren't you? You didn't want to hurt anyone when
> you said all that about stinking Hun-gooks and sick self-esteemed offensive
> racists, did you? How unfair that *you* should get hurt!

Admitting the phenomenon of your being nervous about the term
"Hun-gooks" and "sick self-esteemed offensive racists" would prove
that you are either a "Hun" or a "sick self-esteemed offensive
racist".

> > You would have treated us as "subhuman drivel" anyway no matter what I
> > say.
> 
> Oh, stop your pathetic whining! For the last time, you are *not* subhuman
> drivel, and I have not *treated* you as subhuman drivel. It is your *use of
> language* that is subhuman drivel. You are perfectly capable of acting like
> a decent human being whenever you choose.
> 
> Now dry up. You're giving Kinai a bad name.

Thanks a lot for commenting about my partially being *not* subhuman.