"John R. Yamamoto- Wilson" <john@rarebooksinjapan.com> wrote in message news:bat2gr$1u6p$1@kanna.cc.sophia.ac.jp...

<snipped>

> I am sure I have been ironic, and I may have been satirical, but I don't
> think I have been sarcastic. And I haven't been wild about it. I've chosen
> my words with care.

But surely you hurted me, so it's sarcasm. I'm very nervous about
people ethnically insult me because of being Kansai-jin.

> I told you what I thought of your exchange of insults with Supertech, and
> you responded by trying to put me on the defensive, calling me a racist. I
> showed that the grounds for assuming I was racist were false, and you seemed
> to accept that. But to me the big deal is not whether *I* am racist, but
> whether *you* were crude and offensive.
> 
> Conclusion: you *were* and *are* crude and offensive ("wanking tokyojaps",
> et cetera, et cetera, et boring bloody cetera).

Accorfing to your theory, calling someone as "crude" is an offensive
drivel isn't it?
Tokyojaps, the honorary whites  are really offensive and aggressive to
us. I can't do nothing about that. It's not our fault but their own.
They are scornfully calling me and Kansai-jin as Chon(Koreans), and
severely despising us, so I have morally right to despise them. If
they ever stop insulting us, I will stop calling them so.

> Now, if you want to call a truce at this stage, that's fine, I have no
> further quarrel with you. Call people all the rude names you want, just so
> long as you know that, from where I'm sitting, all that kind of name-calling
> is subhuman drivel.

You would have treated us as "subhuman drivel" anyway no matter what I
say.