grunt100@msn.com (grunt100@msn.com) wrote in message news:<5ba2f89c.0306281432.31a6b933@posting.google.com>...
> Me, I, not you, or anyone else of that matter:
> > If missile over Japan was provocative, how provocative was it upward
> > of 200,000 so called comfort women who suffered under Japan but

> This is outrageously militaristic and apologetic for Japan's past.  If
> Japan had not occupied Korea, Korea would not have suffered.  If Japan
> had not invaded China, there would not have been such battles in China.
> With all troubles started by Japan, 50 or years past is the past, and
> yet a rocket over Japan is big trouble because Japan is in peace?  As 
> I wrote before, let it pass another 50 years and a silly rocket over
> Japan will appear harmless.

  
 Korea was going to suffer whether Korea was japanese colony or not.
 To say if japanese did not control korea, korean did not suffer is
 incorrect statement. Korea was suffered even before japanese
 controlling korea. Chosun Dynasty was not good government that most
 korean citizne I mean peasant have no right whatsoever. They allowed
 sucn an low standard of moral code that destoryed the just about
everything
about civillian life. NO civilian life means there was no freedom in
Korean
society. The whole society was based on false view of Confucianism
creating the
social and sexual division that is uniquely oppressive patroarchial.
This
kind of society is not going to survive whether japanese controlling
korea
or not. Confucian Chosun Dynasty should be destory befored Japanese
arrived
there. Had Tonk-Hak Revolution succeed korea would be progressed far
more than now and would destoryed a demoralized false Confucianism. So
blaming japanese
for all the korean suffering  is just not right. It's small view to
blame
japaneses.