> Nick Maclaren wrote:
> > In article <4455d65d@212.67.96.135>,
> > Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)" <reply@newsgroups.com> writes:
> > |>
> > |> Nick it does enlarge sufficiently to see the "cherry like" bark and much
> > |> more detail of the flowers.  It looks like one of those graft type things
> > |> that has been buggad around with.
> > |> Perhaps a Daphne on a pear:-)
> >
> > The bark doesn't look very cherry-like to me - it was the thing that made
> > me think that it WASN'T a cherry -  and I can't see any detail on the
> > flowers.

6 new photos including front & read of petals, and what I can get of
the leaves.

http://www.declan.tv/gardening_misadventures/what_tree_is_this.html

Any ideas?