Nick Maclaren wrote:
> In article <4455d65d@212.67.96.135>,
> Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\)" <reply@newsgroups.com> writes:
> |>
> |> Nick it does enlarge sufficiently to see the "cherry like" bark and much
> |> more detail of the flowers.  It looks like one of those graft type things
> |> that has been buggad around with.
> |> Perhaps a Daphne on a pear:-)
>
> The bark doesn't look very cherry-like to me - it was the thing that made
> me think that it WASN'T a cherry -  and I can't see any detail on the
> flowers.

Photos are the best, but would these 4 help identify it at all?
http://www.declan.tv/gardening_misadventures/what_tree_is_this.html

Regards Declan,
Okazaki, Japan