Murder He Wrote?

MURDER HE WROTE?


10 Downing Street, London continues to ignore the fact that a murder attempt
was made on me by Special Squad police officers on the night of 4-5th
February 2003. Two days before that murder attempt my home had come under an
illegal police siege when I refused to give it up to the mass of crime used
against me to bring about that situation. Over the years I had been publicly
involved in raising my concerns at the involvement of Freemasonry in what is
shown to be most spheres of public authorities in the UK. In 1996 I had
contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry
into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary (Nolan Inquiry). That
Inquiry was a whitewash of the true facts. My own case, and I am aware of
many such similar cases, is proof of the control/influence of Freemasonry
within the police, judiciary and other authorities. I include 10 Downing
Street, London in this.

Both Downing Street and the Home Office have been informed of the murder
attempt that was made on me. Downing Street is shown to be practising
deception in this matter along with ignoring the mass of crime which I have
reported in my letters to Prime Minister Blair since 1997.  The Home Office
is also failing in its public duty to act responsibly in these  matters.
Under Common Law both  Prime Minister Tony Blair and the Home Secretary
David Blunkett, by failing in their public duty to act in the interests of
the public are thus party to that crime used against me, as if they had
actually carried it out themselves.

Copied below are some likely reasons for the murder attempt having been made
on me. The fact that both 10 Downing Street, London, and the Home Office
continue to use deception in these matters helps back up my allegations.
Keeping my mouth shut in the matters below may well have been the reason for
it.

1) The Queen of England Wales and Scotland is Patron Head of UK Freemasonry.
Freemasonry is generally regarded as being the worlds leading Secret
Society. The Queen is also head of the Church of England which is of course
a Christian church.  Freemasonry is not nor ever will be compatible with
Christianity  (.http://www.demonbuster.com/z6masons.html) Deception is all
part of the Masonic infested  UK Establishment. Freemasonry is heavily
associated with Judaism which is anything but a Christian religion.

2) The judicial oath of fairness to all manner of people, that is sworn by
all judges and magistrates to the Queen when they take up Office is a scam.
The Queen wont act when these people breach that oath which they do so very
often. This fact was proved following my letter sent to the Queen in 2002.

3) The UK judiciary have no government or public accountability whatsoever
and that applies to their use of serious crime. By  failing to have any
public accountability in any form whatsoever which is the present true
situation, they are thus an illegal body until they are brought under such
public or Parliamentary accountability..

4) The UK judiciary are an illegal body by reason that they have no such
accountability whatsoever. The UK constitution, unwritten though it is, has
never agreed that judges are above the Law. Judges are openly making their
own laws as they proceed to suit their own particular purposes. Prime
Minister Blair promised the UK public a fairer Britain. In fact we now have
the opposite situation. By being in the full awareness that the judiciary
are very clearly illegal by having no accountability to anyone, Tony Blair's
credibility as Prime Minister and there are of course other matters involved
as well, is now called into question

5) The UK government is also illegal in the circumstances that they are
allowing the present situation described in 3) and 4). The ultimate UK court
has been  Parliament since the civil wars of the 1640's. Now Parliament are
opting out of their obligation to protect the UK public from crimes carried
out by what has become another but very illegal UK government, that being
the government  of the  judiciary.

6) UK police are protecting judges who carry out the use of serious crime
against their victims. They claim that when a judge lies, it is a judicial
decision and is therefore to be protected by them! Judges are thus shown to
be illegally under our unwritten constitution  by being t held to be above
the law. Because we don't have a written Constitution  judges are afforded
no lawful protection for their crimes either.

7) Mr Fraser Kemp MP, a close acquaintance of Tony Blair, having worked with
him for many years in London just before the 1997 General Election  provided
a dossier of some of the crime that had been used against me by judges at
the Durham and Newcastle County Courts to  the Lord Chancellors Department
(Baroness Scotland), The Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner and the
Attorney General. Their replies  to Fraser Kemp confirmed that they had no
power to act on any judicial crime. When I asked Mr Kemp to raise this very
important matter for and in the general public interest in the House of
Commons, he replied by letter that he is not permitted to raise issues in
the House!!!  What had made Mr Kemp so afraid that he made such statement?
An MP who makes such a statement  is obviously very mistaken or very afraid.

8) Information more recently given to me suggests that Tony Blair and Lord
Hutton may also be members of Freemasonry. In a fax which I sent to Tony
Blair at 10 Downing Street, London, several weeks ago, I asked that he
declare whether or not he was a mason. I required that declaration to
determine whether he was, or was not impartial to what I had been reporting
to him over a number of years.  That fax along with others of my more recent
ones sent to him remain without reply. I therefore have little choice but to
conclude that Tony Blair is likely to be a Freemason. If that is true, that
would also explain why his pre-1997 election promises that he made relative
to Freemasonry have never been acted on. By him Deception is indeed shown to
be all part of the generally corrupt UK Establishment. An Establishment
where whistle blowers are likely to be subject of a secret death sentence as
was attempted on me. Did Dr. David Kelly the Iraqi weapons inspector really
commit suicide?  No I too don't think so. He too knew too much and I, more
than most, feel sure that he was murdered to keep his mouth shut too. There
never were any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and Dr David Kelly
obviously knew that. Yes, public deception is all part of the UK
Establishment.

9) The judicial and police crime used against me, so very blatant as
evidence shows it to be, serves as part of the
proof that the UK has it might be said, returned to a pre 1640's era when a
civil war was then necessary to right the wrongs that were being done to its
people.

10) All UK citizens  are entitled under Article 6(1) of the European Human
Rights Convention, to have access to
impartial or independent tribunals or authorities established by law for the
resolution of their criminal or civil rights. The UK has no such authorities
and this is a blatant violation of  all of our rights as European citizens.
However it is all shown to be part of the public deception now being used by
the UK Establishment which of course includes 10  Downing Street, London,
and the Home Office.

Below is copied the contents of my more recent letter to Prime Minister Tony
Blair. Like the others, the facts that I have given in it continue to be
ignored by him. Those who attempted to murder me on the night of 4/5th
February 2003  at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, remain free. The
Prime Minister is also aware of this fact so I do implicate 10 Downing
Street in what now seems the probability that it had given its consent that
I should be murdered.  The fact that other Special Squad Police officers
watched as the attempt to murder me by stabbing was in progress, suggests
that they had been aware of those intentions. One of them however obviously
had a conscience which would not allow him to be a part of my murder.

The Prime Minister
Mr Tony Blair
10 Downing Street
London SW1A 2AA

10th February 2004.

Dear Mr Prime Minister

The statements that I make herein are true to the best of my knowledge and
belief.

First I accept that those members of staff employed at 10 Downing Street are
authorised to reply on your behalf to letters which members of the public
have sent to you. I add that there are obvious consequences arising from
this fact.

I am disgusted at the recent reply which I recently received from the Home
Office which was in response to my latest letter which I sent to you giving
notice dated 2nd December 2003 and one sent to you the 11th November 2003.
Those letters also detailed the murder attempt made on me by Special Squad
police officers on the night of 4/5th February 2003. That matter along with
the catalogue of crime by what is without doubt an Establishment Masonic
Mafia, has been reported to you on several occasions. It continues to be
ignored and deceit is being used by Downing Street and The Home Office as an
apparent ploy to cover up what has been carried out against me. The latter
being more substantial since I contributed to the Nolan Inquiry into
Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary in 1996. The Home Office wrote
that they have referred the matters that I reported to you to the same
police force which I reported to you as having been involved in extensive
use of serious crime against me, where in addition, two of its Special Squad
officers had attempted to murder me by stabbing on the night of 4/5th
February last year.  The recent Home Office letter does however serve to
confirm that the UK indeed does not have any independent or impartial
tribunals or authorities, which as you will know, are required under the
European Human Rights Convention. That remains as a gross breach of my
rights as a European Citizen.

The facts arising from this breach of my rights has caused me very serious
damage and it was for that reason that I am claiming damages from you by
your failure to set in motion the necessary mechanism for the establishment
of such independent or impartial tribunals or authorities. The cost of those
very substantial damages to me remains and continues to increase. Given that
you continue to allow this situation, and it would appear from facts, that
you are also ignoring the murder attempt made on me on the night of 4th/5th
February last year when my home was unlawfully seized following a catalogue
of judicial and other crime to bring about that situation, those damages are
to be increased in an upward direction. Those two potential police murderers
remain at large. I refuse to believe that the decision to murder me was made
on the spot by those two police officers. Clearly that decision had been
made by a higher level of authority and those persons also remain at large.
Just how high in the chain of authority that decision to murder me might
well be answered by an independent public inquiry. You continue to ignore my
demand for this.

I state again to you that following my receipt of a letter sent to me by Mr
Matt Dowding who was writing on your behalf from Downing Street a letter
dated January 16, 2003, my home came under an illegal police siege. At
around that same period of time I had been publishing correspondence that I
received from your friend Mr Fraser Kemp MP, which confirmed that there are
no authorities in the UK who will act on matters of judicial crime. You will
know Mr Prime Minister that the UK judiciary have no public accountability
whatsoever and that includes the use of blatant crimes used by the criminal
factors employed within the judiciary. The judiciary have no public
accountability whatsoever as has been shown and proved by that
correspondence which I received from Mr Fraser Kemp MP. He had provided a
dossier of evidence backing up my claims of Establishment crime to the Home
Office, The Lord Chancellors Department, The Attorney General and the
Parliamentary Commissioner, all who would not take the responsibility to act
on it as Public Duty surely requires? Is it therefore justice for members of
the public to be accountable to the judiciary while this state of affairs
continues? Can any country be a democracy while this situation continues to
be tolerated? We do have terrorists employed within the UK Establishment
many clearly stemming from Freemasonry. They are shown to be well capable of
carrying out serious crimes which also include murder as was attempted
against me. Those same corrupt Establishment criminal elements are also
attempting to cover up that murder attempt along with the catalogue of crime
that has been used against me. I would find it difficult to accept that you
are not aware of these facts and that Freemasonry is not just an innocent
old boys network. I would agree that the rank and file members of
Freemasonry know little of what the agenda of the higher ranks of
Freemasonry is. That a Masonic Mafia exists in this country there is no
doubt.

I had been in contact with Lord Nolan from 1996 to 1998. I had contributed
to the Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the
Police and Judiciary headed by Lord Nolan which I think now public
contribution to it should have been included in it a government health
warning. I firmly believe that Inquiry covered up the facts of the Masonic
influence/control of the judiciary which also exists within the justice
system generally. My concerns that judges at the Durham and Newcastle County
Courts were possibly or more probably Freemasons was ignored as being
irrelevant by them. Lords Bingham and Woolf along with the Court Service
also maintained that my concerns regarding Masonic influence in what was the
blatant judicial and other crime being used against me at the Durham and
Newcastle County Courts had no relevance. They were of course all wrong
about that matter. That fact is proved under the ruling made in, The Social
Security Commissioners Case No. CSI/136/02. The official ruling under the
latter case was provided as evidence in my appeal for the possession of my
home held on Thursday 30th January 2003 at the Teeside County Court. That
court had previously wrongly ruled on the 20th January 2003 that my concerns
at Masonic influence in my cases had no relevance. The judge at the 30th
January 2003 hearing was provided with an official copy of that ruling and
expressed surprise about it. I then took ill and the judge immediately
adjourned the hearing when an ambulance was called and I was taken to
hospital.

I was never informed, when it seems that what was in the circumstances, an
illegal court hearing, that took place on the following Monday of 3rd
February. It was illegal by reason that I was not informed of it and neither
had the requisite two full working days notice of such hearing had been
served on me. As far as I am concerned, that adjourned hearing of the 30th
of January 1993 which I have referred to above remains as adjourned. All
consequences that I have reported to you following that adjourned court
hearing are also in the circumstances deemed to have also been illegal.

My appeal made on the 30th January at the Teesside County Court, if justice
had really been its intent, had been successful on the grounds that by
ignoring my concerns about possible Masonic influence in my case, there had
been in fact been a breach of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights
Convention. That is verified in ruling under the Social Security
Commissioners case as mentioned above. It seems that someone did not wish
that ruling to prove my appeal case so ignored it. At the hearing of the
30th January 2003 at Teesside County Court I also served on the court and
the opposing side the necessary protocols for my application for Judicial
Review. That too was ignored by the courts I have named to you. That was
further proof that other parties, and I believe were Masons or those doing
their bidding, had decided that injustice would be the outcome for me which
ever way that I proceeded. Immediately after that illegal court hearing of
Monday 3rd January 2003 police then watched as a bailiff tried to force
entry to my home. That was again an illegal act which along with the other
facts and names of Establishment criminals that I have detailed to you, was
the reason why I would not give up my home. Several weeks later Baroness
Scotland,. Parliamentary Spokesperson to the Home Office, proposed a law to
make forced entry to a persons home lawful. Forced entry to a home by a
bailiff in such circumstances still remains unlawful even if the bankruptcy
engineered for me by none other than judicial and other criminals that I
have named to you had not been used against me. The revenge carried out
against me for opposing very corrupt elements of Freemasonry has proved that
they are able to do it with the help/co-operation of what clearly is none
other than other Masonic Establishment criminals.

That some of our courts are being ruled by none other than criminals where
they make up their own illegal laws as they proceed is also proved by the
above facts. That the opposing party in my cases had been allowed very
material perjury and had been assisted with the use of serious crime used
against me by a solicitor then practising from Durham that I have previously
named to you, has all been allowed by what are none other than Establishment
criminals being paid from the public purse to do that.

I, like others that I am aware of, have found that The Office For the
Supervision of Solicitors is also covering up for criminal acts being
carried on by some solicitors. Like the Police Complaints Authority, they
simply fail to acknowledge letters sent to them when they contain facts of
Establishment crime that can be proved by evidence. Is this really the
fairer Britain of your 1997 pre-election promise?

On the first evening of that siege of my home I was made aware that police
had intended to shoot me when to opportunity arose. That fact was made clear
to me by a woman police officer negotiator named to me as Jo at the scene.
Had she not given me an urgent warning to stay away from the window of my
home, then I most certainly would have been shot dead. It is a known fact
that alleged police marksmen know only how to shoot to kill and not wound to
disable. On the third evening of the siege, Special Squad police officers
battered down the door of my home in the early hours of the morning and then
handcuffed me. Several other Special Squad police officers stood on the
lower stairs and watched as those two officers started to push my abdomen
down onto a sword while making noises clearly to help co-ordinate the
pressure they were exerting on each of my shoulders while the sword was
penetrating my abdomen. One of those other officers dragged me away from his
colleagues when I seems he did not wish to be part of murder. It would seem
from my own case that UK police murder squads are now also a reality.
According to Newspaper reports even C.S. Gas had also been intended to be
used against me.

I am aware that the generally speaking, the whole UK Establishment is
infested with members of Freemasonry. That also being very applicable to our
justice system. I have previously demanded from you a full independent
public inquiry into my case which would also prove this fact. You continue
to ignore that demand. I am of course fully aware that such inquiry would
show that UK Freemasonry does have considerable influence/control within the
justice system. I am further concerned that I have been informed that the
Queen is the Patron Head of UK Freemasonry, the Duke of Edinburgh is a Mason
and that the Prince of Wales has quite recently become a Mason. Amongst your
pre-1997 election promises was the matter of dealing with what was even
then, public concerns regarding Freemasonry. It seems that now you believe
that Freemasonry is not a secret society but a society with secrets. Both
statements are in fact true. As a former Hetton-le-Hole Councillor I became
aware of the power of Freemasonry within local government. I was already
aware of its influence/control of the judiciary and its ability to conduct
illegal court hearings. Mr Fraser Kemp MP was also informed what happened to
me when I was prevented from leaving the Hetton Town Council Chambers and
was then assaulted in full view of most of the Council after I protested at
certain Councillors, two of them Masons, in failing to declare an interest
in the matter of land that had come up for Council discussion for housing
proposals for discussion on housing proposals. I wonder was it just
coincidence when the owner of that land who agreed that he was a mason,
asked if I owned my own home. It was clear that what he was implying was
that unless I kept quiet about the matter mentioned above, then I would lose
my home. No Mr Prime Minister, this is the way Freemasonry works. I have
learned that the hard way. That incident alone showed just how much fear is
held by even persons within authority if crossing Freemasons. Mr Kemp MP
also ignored that matter when police refused to act on it.

Downing Street has also written to me that the judiciary are independent of
the government. The Lord Chancellor as head of the judiciary is an unelected
member of the Cabinet and therefore is part of the government. Can you
explain under these same circumstances how the judiciary can be independent
of the government?

I have been given information which if true, suggests that you might also be
a member of Freemasonry. If you are in fact one, then I cannot consider you
to be impartial or independent to what I have reported to you over the years
since 1997. Would you wish to comment on this?

The Norwegian government implemented a law which makes the registration of
extra judicial activities compulsory from November 2002. That might also be
a reasonable start in the UK along with an independent authority who will
look into all allegations of crime used by members of the judiciary. It does
appear Mr Prime Minister that at present we have another ruling government
that is not accountable even for its use of crime as my and many other cases
can show. That government is clearly the judiciary who I would term as the
other government which has become a power accountable to no one. The affects
of this present situation are probably far more serious that most might at
first imagine. That same situation also casts grave doubt on the democracy
of the UK.

I again demand from you an independent public inquiry into my case. It is my
contention that as a mass of blatant judicial and other crime has been used
to take my home and land from me, along with around seventeen thousand
pounds worth of my personal possessions, then it would be appropriate to
carry out acts which could include lawful citizens arrests of those
responsible for my situation and those who have also suffered a similar
situation. That situation would also apply to those who fail or refuse to
carry out their paid public duty to act on the evidence of that crime. I am
aware that I remain at risk of being murdered should I attempt to carry out
such a lawful act. It seems however that I live with that same risk everyday
anyway regardless for the reasons that you are now again aware of. Mr Prime
Minister, the Hell that these criminals that I have named to you now lives
with me every single day and a conscience that justice must endure is indeed
a hard taskmaster.

Yours sincerely

Mr Maurice Kellett

Address withheld for the purposes of this publication only.

http://masonsatwork.50megs.com/about.html
http://www.mason-rule.0catch.com
http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com
http://www.mason-rule.bizhosting.com/PREFACE.htm
http://www.mason-rule.0catch.com/p60.htm The Judgement Approved  Transcript
of a Protected Establishment Criminal

Charter88 Democratic Reform
http://www.charter88.org.uk/sign/index.html
High Priests of Globalisation
http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/index.html
The Bilderbergs. World Elitist Secret Society. The real rulers of the world?
http://www.bilderberg.org/
Fame 97.
http://www.fame97.human-rights.org/

Freemasonry, Plasters of Truth and Advocates Of  The Devil.

maurice.kellett@ntlworld.com