In article <365fcc52.0306140336.55853f12@posting.google.com>, 
kaz@ivebeenframed.com says...
>
>nospam@nospam.net (Kay) wrote in message news:<XvrGa.126$vb7.54359@news.
>uswest.net>...
>> In article <365fcc52.0306092131.3dca427a@posting.google.com>, 
>> kaz@ivebeenframed.com says...
>> >
>> >The Count <vlad@impaler.com> wrote in message news:<3EE547F3.9FBFAB46
>@im
>> >paler.com>...
>>  
>> >This is an ultimate racist's logic. Anyone of any race insulting or
>> >discriminating against any other race is a racist. Including a Black
>> >insulting Whites. Defining  like "if a Korean was flaming a jap, by
>> >definition this is not racism" is a racist's logic. There is no race
>> >that is officially admited to insult a specific race.
>> 
>> Hmm, I happen to agree with your definition of a racist.
>> The funny thing is you do insult Koreans
>> and you proclaimed you hate Koreans.  Doesn't
>> that put yourself squarely in a racist chair?
>> Or, does that apply only to Koreans?
>
>Yes, I declared that I'm a racist against Koreans because you adore
>such a blonde-porn-loving midget dictator, but not only Koreans, also
>"Hideyoshi" of a dumb tokyojap rightwing racist against Kansaijin in
>the above.

Because a few Koreans defend the NK dictator, you
hate all Koreans?  Isn't that pretty drastic?
Hideyoshi and his cronies are racists against 
Kansaijin.  Should't you hate all Japanese?
George Bush is doing some terrible things.  Should
you hate all Americans?  Sadam Hussein is/was a
terrible dictator.  Should you hate all Iraqis?
Ariel Sharon has done pretty awful stuff.  Do
you think we should hate all Isarelis?