"Kay" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:LRqGa.122$vb7.50367@news.uswest.net...
> In article <l35Ga.401$_I7.31195316@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com>,
USA@aol.com
> says...
> >
> >
> >"The Count" <vlad@impaler.com> wrote in message
> >news:3EE8D910.BE6978FA@impaler.com...
> >> Question, what do the following places have in common:
> >>
> >> Vietnam
> >> Hong Kong
> >> Phillipines
> >> Korea
> >> Thailand
> >> Singapore
> >> Africa
> >> South America
> >> Iraq
> >> and...America
> >>
> >> all have in common?
> >>
> >> Answer: white people have colonized them.  Does this answer your quest
> >ion?
> >
> >The Americans are responsible for the creation of the ROK and they are
> >white.
> >The Soviets were responsible for the creation of the DPRK, and they are
> >white.
> >But I don't recall any time period when Korea was a "colony" of white
> >people.
>
> You just said it.  The US colonized S. Korea
> and USSR colonized N. Korea for 3 years.
>

There you go WRITING YOUR OWN PSYCHOTIC VERSION OF HISTORY.
In neither case was Korea "colonized".


> >white Americans. After all, the US had nothing to do whatsover with many
> > of
> >these places.
>
> The US colonized Phillipines.  The US colonized
> S. Korea for 3 years.  The US tried to colonize
> Vietname for over 15 years, miserably failing at that.
> Many South American countries are in many ways
> colonies of the US, not in the traditional sense
> but in the 20th century sense, that is under
> the heavy influence of the US power.  Would you
> say Hungay was a USSR colony from 1945 until
> the USSR crumbled?

These were not "colonies".
Your HATRED FOR AMERICA is oozing.