None, following in the footsteps of lysenko, posted:
 
 >Dear Colleagues,
 >
 >We are going on publishing the 5th volume of works of our laboratory
 >with the paper
 >
 >" On reality of black holes "

  Naturally, you'll conclude the opposite of what physicists who actually
study general relativity conclude. Why the facade? In fact, why not ask
people to contribute to a list of physical results from every corner of
physics which you could then use as the starting point for a multi-volume
treatise against every aspect of modern physics in a single definitive
work? For each item on the list, you could devote an entire chapter to an
obfuscated argument that agreement with experimental data and a mathe-
matically rigorous argument aren't sufficient to save the theory from
the simplicity, clarity or obviousness of it's starting assumptions.