Harry: 
 >
 >"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@OVE.netcom.ca> wrote in message
 >news:ZjfKb.74347$by2.859190@wagner.videotron.net...
 >> "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@epfl.ch> wrote in message
 >> news:3ff969fe$1@epflnews.epfl.ch...
 >> >
 >> > "Franz Heymann" <notfranz.heymann@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
 >> > news:btbcc0$qri$5@titan.btinternet.com...
 >> > >
 >> > > "Sergey Karavashkin" <selftrans@yandex.ru> wrote in message
 >> > > news:a42650fc.0401041424.31edb781@posting.google.com...
 >> > >
 >> > > [snip
 >> > >
 >> > > . This theorem is
 >> > > > incompatible with the current system of Maxwell equations.
 >> > >
 >> > > Then you are a crackpot.
 >> >
 >> > Your logic labels Einstein a crackpot...
 >>
 >> Einstein's equations are wholly compatible with Maxwell's.
 >
 >Except for low velocities, Einstein's theorems are incompatible with
 >Newton's equations.
 >Similarly, Ampere's equations are partially incompatible with those of
 >Maxwell.
 
  That's non-sense. Newtonian physics is a limiting case of relativity.
Ampere's law is a limiting case of maxwell's equations (i.e., quasi-
static fields). A theory which is a limiting case of another theory
indicates compatibility and specifies why one is the limit of the
other. Two theories which are incompatible make different predictions
about the same phenomena in a way that the difference cannot be
resolved in terms of a domain of applicability.