Scripsit illud Disaster <disaster@disfanfic.NOSPAM.net>:
> "Rudolf Polzer" <AntiATField_adsgohere@durchnull.de> wrote:
> > Scripsit ille Zeruel333 The Hentai One <zeruel333@aol.comanimefan>:
> > > >Scripsit ille Zeruel333 The Hentai One <zeruel333@aol.comanimefan>:
> > > >[...]
> > > >> No shielding can possibly protect from a black hole!
> > > >
> > > >*watching your black hole sinking into a Dirac sea*
> > >
> > > that's impossible; black holes cannot be sucked into a dirac sea
> >
> > Did you try?
> >
> > According to current theories, you're right. But: look at Newton, look
> > at Einstein. They all were wrong and physics behaved only
> > "approximately" as they predicted. So why should the current physical
> > model be right? From time to time, we get better approximations. But
> > we'll never understand physics completely.
> 
> As all genius has been proven wrong before we could say that you could
> also be wrong. It is concievable that we will one day get an accurate
> model of the laws of physics.

Exactly. I knew this will come - but it does not render black holes being
sucked into a Dirac see impossible.

Well, even I don't think it would work, but where should I know?

-- 
MG>>>> http://####.#####.##/#######/###/##########.exe
FK>>> Was ist "exe"?
RP>> Das, wof$(D??(Br man Wein braucht, weil es sich sonst nicht exekutieren l$(D??(Bsst.
FG> Oder virtuell Ware auf der Maschine.      <20020708183219.GE669@grossing.de>