Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!news.daionet.gr.jp!news.yamada.gr.jp!passion.nalgo.co.jp!news.moat.net!prodigy.com!newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr14.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!9a2493fe!not-for-mail
From: "necoandjeff" <spam@schrepfer.com>
Newsgroups: fj.life.in-japan
References: <19d9o01i6j330gqv4c8orjdmuo3ai8i2mc@4ax.com>   <2ukbgkF291po5U42@uni-berlin.de> <0j2bo0lgl9fc8kg6gqkuk4tf8ua9e3mh2k@4ax.com> <2ulh11F291po5U52@uni-berlin.de> <leebo0lohoeqnvrbiici5ouou2dahgnr0h@4ax.com> <2uoervF2b2i1lU3@uni-berlin.de> <ch6eo05gb1vfcrpd1jc45ta3t0r57j44gr@4ax.com> <2uqt4rF2djf60U1@uni-berlin.de> <k9igo0tbv2rnto16gd5qcdatj1hcleq3b6@4ax.com> <2ur17jF2djf60U8@uni-berlin.de> <cm9qrm$qje$1@news.Stanford.EDU> <2ura1vF2b5t85U2@uni-berlin.de> <cmapar$khv$1@news.Stanford.EDU> <uq6id.17237$6q2.1098@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com> <4188F4A3.923127A0@yahoo.co.jp>
Subject: Re: I'm Usama bin Laden, and I approved this message
Lines: 35
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Message-ID: <lE6id.17244$6q2.16838@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 219.109.192.76
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr14.news.prodigy.com 1099495057 ST000 219.109.192.76 (Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:17:37 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 10:17:37 EST
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
X-UserInfo1: F[OGR\_E@B^SSVDYLJJ\OPLI[B]NQHMHCIXNMRQIMASJETAANVW[AKWZE\]^XQWIGNE_[EBL@^_\^JOCQ^RSNVLGTFTKHTXHHP[NB\_C@\SD@EP_[KCXX__AGDDEKGFNB\ZOKLRNCY_CGG[RHT_UN@C_BSY\G__IJIX_PLSA[CCFAULEY\FL\VLGANTQQ]FN
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:17:37 GMT
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.life.in-japan:20961

Eric Takabayashi wrote:
> necoandjeff wrote:
>
>> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
>>> Kevin Gowen <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:
>>>> mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
>>>>> Kevin Gowen <kgowenNOSPAM@myfastmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course he is legally blameless. That is different from saying,
>>>>>> "He did not perjure himself" OJ Simpson is legally blameless.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> I bet OJ has a yummy cock.
>>>
>>>> Whoa!
>>>
>>> If you say so, and you did.
>>>
>>> However, the civil found him NOT to be blameless.
>>
>> The civil found him more likely than not to be to blame.
>
> Is likelihood enough reason to demand a man pay millions of dollars?
> No, he was "found" liable.

Yes, in fact it is. It is called preponderence of the evidence.

>> There is no absolute.
>
> Except whether he did it or not.

See my other post about your difficulty in distinguishing between
metaphysical and legal concepts.