Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!news.heimat.gr.jp!news.tutrp.tut.ac.jp!newsgw.ayashii.or.jp!news.moat.net!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s02.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: russj41@concentric.net (MacHamish)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.japan,soc.culture.british,soc.culture.scottish,soc.culture.china,fj.life.in-japan
Subject: Re: Why do chinks hate japs and not brits?
Reply-To: rjimeson1@comcast.net
Message-ID: <jnb1r0d6t6de0se61nu1cnt8g3s7ukj11o@4ax.com>
References: <30agdjF2tf97qU1@uni-berlin.de> <41a10b89.15140851@news> <v6j6q01l8nr5918p69l0ugelf0v5g5otv3@4ax.com> <30hdpiF301o97U1@uni-berlin.de> <p269q0dft8hv4r103o8gb3ttgshu44qa1g@4ax.com> <30ppt3F34speoU1@uni-berlin.de> <iqlfq0d2kkkq7rs1ncsodq583gnh00nbq6@4ax.com> <30sahgF31o15rU1@uni-berlin.de> <18ejq0hij0mj06inm3agl4rlcsvtu6eikp@4ax.com> <M4Crd.13408$3U4.283610@news02.tsnz.net> <m63uq0p3a5pr6qmvihugerf2qbfmtabj38@4ax.com> <JqRrd.13487$3U4.288541@news02.tsnz.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 41
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.162.199.193
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s02 1102098211 67.162.199.193 (Fri, 03 Dec 2004 18:23:31 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 18:23:31 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 18:23:31 GMT
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.life.in-japan:23046

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:53:03 +1300, "Adam Whyte-Settlar"
<grawillers@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"MacHamish" <russj41@concentric.net> wrote in message
>news:m63uq0p3a5pr6qmvihugerf2qbfmtabj38@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 23:25:58 +1300, "Adam Whyte-Settlar"
>> <grawillers@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"MacHamish" <russj41@concentric.net> wrote in message
>> >news:18ejq0hij0mj06inm3agl4rlcsvtu6eikp@4ax.com...
>> >
>> >> The proof of the pudding will come in a hundred years when the
>> >> history of this affair is written.
>> >
>> >Depends who wins.
>>
>> Very good, Adam, although I wouldn't have thought my point needed any
>> further elucidation.  At least you're showing an improved ability to
>> comprehend the obvious.  There may be a glimmer of hope for you.
>>
>> >A W-S
>> >PS. Simply breathtaking hypocrisy by the way.
>>
>> But apparently you still have a ways to go in terms of understanding more
>> complex ideas.
>
>Dear, oh dear.
>That's pretty pathetic even for a simpleton such as yourself MacH. In any
>case how could you possibly know.
>If I get a break from the insane 'must have it finished by Xmas' fetishism
>of my landscaping clients I might get a chance to sail an oil tanker through
>the ridiculous holes in your rants.
>Some of it is blatently spurious and a good deal of the rest is simply wrong
>information.
>As Mozart said; I'll be bach.

And I'll still be here, waiting to blow your oil tanker out of the water.

MacHamish Mór
