John W. <worthj1970@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 14, 12:24?am, CL <flot...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On 08/14/2011 12:26 PM, mtfes...@netMAPSONscape.net wrote:
> >
> > > C'mon, this is a flame war. I got in the ad-hominem, invoked the nazis, and
> > > just got around to threatening to report him to his ISP. Next, I have to
> > > accuse him of something unsavory, like pedophilia or being a ?Bachmann
> > > supporter. At some point I'll have to X-post this to groups like
> > > alt.rec.hamster-up-the-butt then post his home address (John, that reminds
> > > me; could you email your home address so I can post it? Thanks.), then
> > > threaten to contact his boss about misuse of the internet while at work.
> >
> > > (What steps am I missing here...)
> >
> > Lessee ... you didn't create a web site to post photos of him, his
> > house, extended family, pets (especially mangy dogs with a bandanna or a
> > man's belt for a collar), and copies of his arrest, court, and prison
> > records, or booking photos. ?You haven't crossposted any messages from
> > people claiming some connection to the legal profession or police
> > describing in painful detail stuff they investigated him for, were told
> > they should investigate him for, or stuff they thought it would be a
> > good idea to investigate him for (should include at least one charge
> > each of bestiality and incest), preferably with the transcript of a
> > phone call to at least one sheriff's department somewhere in the Deep
> > South. ?And, of course, you're missing the complete transcript of a
> > flame war between him and some person who later disappeared from Usenet
> > mysteriously -- like his phone was disconnected and he never showed back
> > up again -- that took place some time in 2003.
> >
> Note to self: do not start flame war with CL. He fights like a girl,
> and I mean that to be flattering. That bastard Mike has nothing on
> him.

> I thought it odd neither of you mentioned contacting my wife about all
> of this, but then I think you know I'm married to a Japanese lady and
> she A) won't understand what a newsgroup is (will probably think it's
> related to CNN); and B) won't care anyway, and might actually
> appreciate it if I'm out of the way for awhile.

I'll go with "B"

Mike