On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 22:17:18 +0900, Raj Feridun
<rferid@NOSPAMyahoo.co.jp> belched the alphabet and kept on going
with:

>On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:09:19 +0900, Rodney Webster
><rgw_news001@knot.mine.nu> wrote:
>
>>In article <udi3svg0affvsv04tnus995qsluuhrtuul@4ax.com>,
>> Michael Cash <mikecash@sunfield.ne.jp> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:10:14 +0900, Raj Feridun
>>> <rferid@NOSPAMyahoo.co.jp> belched the alphabet and kept on going
>>> with:
>>> 
>>> >On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:01:51 +0900, Crunch Buttsteak
>>> ><puntspeedchunk@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:29:57 +0900, Raj Feridun
>>> >><rferid@NOSPAMyahoo.co.jp> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>>On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 14:37:49 +0900, Scott Reynolds <sar@gol.com>
>>> >>>wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>>But that's not possible since you know what my reality
>>> >>>here is. Or is this just a side effect of knowing everything about
>>> >>>everything? By the way please teach me how to do that!
>>> >
>>> >>P.S. - Scott doesn't know anything about everything, Rodney does.
>>> >
>>> >Awesome, how do I get in touch with this Rodney? I want to go from
>>> >knowing very little to knowing everything about everything!
>>> 
>>> One does not get in touch with Rodney. One waits to be called. It's a
>>> religious kinda thing, ya see.
>>
>>Indeed.
>>
>>The paradox is that although I do in fact know everything, I do not have 
>>answers to all of the questions.  For that he would have to seek "The 
>>Answer Man (TM)", but his presence is even more mysterious and elusive 
>>than mine.
>
>Oh my God, I just saw him!
>

You should be so blessed. What you saw was an apparition. Sort of a
Lamont Cranston mind-clouding, but in reverse.