Michael Cash wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:11:36 -0700, Dan Rempel <drempel@hurtly_flurty>
> brought down from the Mount tablets inscribed:
>
>
>>Michael Cash wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:17:06 +0900, Raj Feridun
>>><rferid@NOSPAMyahoo.co.jp> brought down from the Mount tablets
>>>inscribed:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 09:49:46 +0900, Michael Cash
>>>><mikecash@buggerallspammers.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Obviously not. I take it you're a dittohead?
>>>>
>>>>>Ah, the favorite tactic of the disparagers....writing them off with a
>>>>>dismissive insult. Call me a dittohead if it makes you feel better.
>>>>>I've never thought of myself as one, though.
>>>>
>>>>I think it's telling that you took my comment as an insult. It was in
>>>>no way meant to be one. I might just have asked "I take it you're a
>>>>Rush Limbaugh fan?" (and almost did)
>>>
>>>
>>>I didn't realize there was ever a time a liberal used the term
>>>"dittohead" as anything but a dismissive insult. Sorry if I
>>>misunderstood you. I certainly don't take offense at being confused
>>>for one. I see no shame in having conservative views, listening to
>>>Rush's show, or agreeing with some of his ideas.
>>>
>>>I wish I could remember where the quote came from, but I can't.
>>>Recently a caller to a show (believe it was Oprah, but maybe not) said
>>>something like "I had a harder time coming out as a conservative than
>>>I did coming out as a lesbian."
>>>
>>>Admitting you're a conservative or a Rush listener is sort of like
>>>admitting you used to watch Hee-Haw. Millions more did it than will
>>>actually 'fess up to it. And for the same reasons.
>>
>>Don't know why I can't resist butting in, but here goes: except for Buck
>>Owens, I loved Hee-Haw. Is this off-topic enough?
>
>
> Repeat after me: "Today, I become a man"

I tried that, but I still feel the same, except for my desire to dress
up like Minnie Pearl. Is that bad?

Dan