In article <MpqdnWTHu_UYZF_fRVn-jg@comcast.com>, "Ron Mexico" <Estoscacahuates@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>"GMAN" <glenzabr@xmission.com> wrote in message 
>news:d9uq14$ii$2@news.xmission.com...
>> In article <Abywe.58659$G8.28585@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, "Seefor" 
>> <invalid@email.address> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> The bigger they are the harder they fall. Sony's time at the top will 
>>>> have
>>>> end at some point (maybe not even this generation) I just hope they
>>>> haven't invested so much money that it brings down their TV empire as
>>>> well.
>>>>
>>>
>>>It starts:
>>>
>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4632931.stm
>>>
>>>
>> All that shows is that the demand for old style CRT's have fallen in favor 
>> of
>> LCD, DLP, and plasma technologies. How in the hell does this have anything 
>> to
>> do with the PS3 or Sony's solvency?
>
>I was wondering the same thing.  Maybe if he had pointed to the link about 
>Sony dropping out of the plasma production loop in favor of LCD that would 
>have been a little closer to being relevant even though it is only a rumor. 
>
>
Even that would make sense as the plasma technology has the most problems in 
the long run. Severe burnin etc...