tm wrote:
> Brett Robson wrote:
> 
>>Brett Robson wrote:
>>
>>>tm wrote:
>>>
>>>>Brett Robson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>John W. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Brett Robson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>John W. wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Brett Robson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>John W. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Brett Robson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>TXZZ wrote:
> 
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>I think France has a lower crime rate than US because the
>>>>>>>>>>>>french keep stupid people like you (women) in their place
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>So who is stupid then?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Pay attention. He clearly said French Women were stupid.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>But they get better results (less crime) than the smarter US men.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Maybe he's saying that the women in France are not only stupid, 
>>>>>>>>but also
>>>>>>>>a bunch of crazy criminals, and by putting them in their place 
>>>>>>>>they can't possibly break any laws.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>But the problem is Louise isn't French, is she?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I think the problem is we are trying to find some sense in Matty's 
>>>>>>>orginal post.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh. I thought we were making fun of him.
>>>>>
>>>>>No, I was making fun of you. I thought you were making fun of louise.
>>>>
>>>>If I were to waste my time with a bread analogy i'd probably say that 
>>>>i always pictured Ms Bremner as a spicy crouton and superoutland as an 
>>>>overboiled pudding.
>>>>I'd call you guys a couple of crackers.
>>>>But then i'd never waste my time with such a stupid analogy.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Good, there has been far too much stupidity on this thread so far.
>>
>>damn,damn,damn I meant to write
>>Good, there has been far too much stupidity on this bread so far.
> 
> 
> Wouldn't have gotten much of a rise out of me either way.

That's was a really stupid /pan/.

(I think that was a flop, dough?)