"Toon" wrote ...
> I see it wrong as in Evoultionists say, man first appeared 500,000
> years ago, but in reality it was 750,000.  Because it sounds to me
> like Ed is saying he has fossils from even earlier than evolutionists
> claim.  he also said they're just about like modern man, meaning,
> there's some differences, which would prove evolution anyway.

Except that what he's 'found' just aren't fossils at all, whether they 
are 'modern human' or not just doesn't come into it in the first place.