Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!news.daionet.gr.jp!news.yamada.gr.jp!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!headwall.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!shelby.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net Newsgroups: fj.life.in-japan Subject: Re: I'm Usama bin Laden, and I approved this message Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Subtlties R'nt Us Lines: 34 Sender: Mike Fester Message-ID: References: <0oo9o0t7ot2addmdj99bo3u3t6rpqqsuqg@4ax.com> <418DBC3B.144E5E1C@yahoo.co.jp> <418E2144.FB03513B@yahoo.co.jp> <418E7158.CA65C3BE@yahoo.co.jp> <418F7374.BDE4F6FD@yahoo.co.jp> <4190B359.55AA0F7A@yahoo.co.jp> <4190D5C8.46F8069F@yahoo.co.jp> Reply-To: mtfester@netscape.net NNTP-Posting-Host: haven.stanford.edu X-Trace: news.Stanford.EDU 1100011265 7596 171.67.16.19 (9 Nov 2004 14:41:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@news.stanford.edu User-Agent: tin/1.5.12-20020311 ("Toxicity") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.26 (i686)) Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.life.in-japan:21662 Eric Takabayashi wrote: > mtfester@netMAPSONscape.net wrote: >> "Protects the public from crime"? > Yes. That is the system I am talking about in contrast to what is in 1984 which is as > you and others describe. Sorry, you've extolled the virtues of the system. >> Did you read the book? Did you UNDERSTAND it? > Yeah. What was in 1984 was bad. I'm talking about another system. No, you're talking about the same system; you know, monitoring everyone, and even the watchers are watched. You simply didn't understand what you read. >> Or do you not consider an artificial war simply to kill off "excess production" and >> control the population a crime? > What aspect of controlling the population is a crime? Uh, killing them? Else why would murder be a crime? BTW, will you do a quick calculation for San Francisco now, please, just initial setup costs. Thank you. Mike