The four spurious you've added removed from followups. This is OT for W7 
too.

In message <pkmed1$p4c$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>, Mr. Man-wai 
Chang <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> writes:
>On 8/10/2018 7:29 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:>
>> Generally, there's no point in responding to such posts - it just 
>>means  that those who have killfiled the originator end up seeing at 
>>least  parts of his/her posts anyway, even though they'd decided they 
>>didn't  want to.
>>
>
>I responded because children don't have sex with their immediate 
>genetic parents, not in Hong Kong at least. Incest is a criminal 
>offense in Hong Kong! Not sure about China nor Britain though.... 
>Well....
[]
I don't know. Is what's illegal in HK the act itself, or only if 
conception takes place? If it's the act, is it illegal if both are 
adults and contraception (physical or medical) is used? How about if the 
participants didn't know (adoptees meeting their naturals without 
knowing)?
-- 
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

... each generation tends to imagine that its attitude to sex strikes just
about the right balance; that by comparison its predecessors were prim and
embarrassed, its successors sex-obsessed and pornified. - Julian Barnes, Radio
Times 9-15 March 2013