On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:49:26 +0900, Ernest Schaal
<eschaal@max.hi-ho.ne.jp> wrote:

>> The Moore-haters don't refute the so-called lies with facts. They
>> instead attack Moore personally.

>It is not an "attack" to say that Moore is what he readily admits to be.

Nothing wrong with propaganda when it happens to be the truth.

>> See the film for yourself. Believe it or not and if you're going to
>> come out publically and call Moore a liar actually have some facts to
>> back that up. They would speak way louder than the name-calling.

>No one is calling him a "liar." We are simply saying that he is presenting
>propaganda, although entertaining propaganda. 

See above.