Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!onodera-news!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.vmunix.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!12-231-204-179.client.attbi.COM!not-for-mail From: "Bob Hatch" Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.dcameras,alt.graphics.photoshop,alt.photography,fj.comp.dev.digital-camera,rec.photo.35mm,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm Subject: Re: Fuji Finepix S2 and Portraits Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:21:11 -0700 Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <7bBZa.150063$rsJ.32218@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12-231-204-179.client.attbi.com (12.231.204.179) X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1060618868 33362090 12.231.204.179 (16 [85448]) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.comp.dev.digital-camera:644 "McLeod" wrote in message news:wePZa.153188$hOa.3291@news02.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com... > If white balance is the only problem why not just shoot in raw and make your > white balance corrections there? Same thing as doing it on the camera. > I don't understand peoples facination with wanting to "use raw" and correct everything later. Why is it not easier to white balance once, in camera, rather than 80 times in computer. It takes me less than 15 seconds to do a manual white balance in camera. After that every darn image is "close" to color perfect. Heck, maybe you have a lot more time than I do to fiddle with images on the screen. -- http://www.bobhatch.com Our web site about RV Stuff A work in progress