"Seefor" <invalid@email.address> wrote in message 
news:i3Fwe.59033$G8.27626@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> "Ron Mexico" <Estoscacahuates@comcast.net> wrote in message 
> news:MpqdnWTHu_UYZF_fRVn-jg@comcast.com...
>>
>> "GMAN" <glenzabr@xmission.com> wrote in message 
>> news:d9uq14$ii$2@news.xmission.com...
>>> In article <Abywe.58659$G8.28585@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, "Seefor" 
>>> <invalid@email.address> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>> The bigger they are the harder they fall. Sony's time at the top will 
>>>>> have
>>>>> end at some point (maybe not even this generation) I just hope they
>>>>> haven't invested so much money that it brings down their TV empire as
>>>>> well.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It starts:
>>>>
>>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4632931.stm
>>>>
>>>>
>>> All that shows is that the demand for old style CRT's have fallen in 
>>> favor of
>>> LCD, DLP, and plasma technologies. How in the hell does this have 
>>> anything to
>>> do with the PS3 or Sony's solvency?
>>
>> I was wondering the same thing.  Maybe if he had pointed to the link 
>> about Sony dropping out of the plasma production loop in favor of LCD 
>> that would have been a little closer to being relevant even though it is 
>> only a rumor.
>>
>
> Either way Playstation will fade and die.  I am right, and will be proven 
> right.
>

No, you are a moron and you have proven so every time you post.