Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!yynet.tama.tokyo.jp!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
From: selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter
Subject: Re: Maxwell's and Faraday's formulations of induction
Date: 13 Jul 2004 15:49:28 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <a42650fc.0407131449.366c1ce8@posting.google.com>
References: <a42650fc.0407111955.363f0bf7@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.177.112.246
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1089758992 6854 127.0.0.1 (13 Jul 2004 22:49:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:49:52 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.sci.matter:204

Dear Colleagues, it seems, you already successfully have read the
abstract ;-) and now it is a good time to give you a complete address
of our paper. Please click this:

http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/v4_1/contents4.html#emf 

Of course, I understand, those who used to build their conceptions on
Maxwell equations may feel inconvenient, just as they felt
inconvenient before, when we announced our study on induction process
in a single wire. None the less, as we rigorously proved in our work,
Maxwellian integral formulation of induction has an intolerably
limited domain of validity, which disables us to use it when
introducing the analogy between the moving wire in a permanent
magnetic field and stationary wire in time-variable magnetic field, on
whose basis the standard Maxwell equations just were introduced.
However, the Nature is such as it is, and we have to study it as it
is. No one of us can change this situation. So we have to seek our
understanding in facts which fit the Nature, not vice versa. I hope
for your understanding in it.

Best to you all, 

Sergey