Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!honnetnews!news.gw.fukushima-u.ac.jp!azuma!news.tains.tohoku.ac.jp!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed.icl.net!proxad.net!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter Subject: Re: Spiral arms of proton and galaxy Date: 9 Jun 2004 14:42:44 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <40C12A7B.5050502@petcom.com> <40C1BE67.8E86D207@mchsi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.177.112.246 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1086817365 4841 127.0.0.1 (9 Jun 2004 21:42:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 21:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.sci.matter:176 Sam Wormley wrote in message news:<40C1BE67.8E86D207@mchsi.com>... > John Sefton wrote: > > > > http://www.petcom.com/~john/ > > Galaxy model for atom > > Crank Information > http://www.google.com/search?q=%22GALAXY+MODEL+For+The+ATOM%22+site%3Awww.crank.net Strange, what concern has my paper? I estimate your informativeness and often say it, but in this case I don't understand your reaction. Even if John were wrong in his study (I still did not read but will, so I mean the worst possible case), this gives a right to no one to represent his work as crankwork. I believe, if you think better, you will agree with it. Regards, Sergey