Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!yynet.tama.tokyo.jp!Q.T.Honey!diablo.efnet.com!efnet.com!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!news.glorb.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field Date: 4 May 2004 14:38:05 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.177.112.246 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1083706686 8761 127.0.0.1 (4 May 2004 21:38:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 21:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.sci.matter:163 "Franz Heymann" wrote in message news:... > "Sergey Karavashkin" wrote in message > news:a42650fc.0404201339.712f1cba@posting.google.com... > > > [snip] > > > You relativists even don't understand: when for example Franz > refused > > to find independently the > > circulation of vector in the suggested animation, > > Franz knows when he is up against a monumental ignoramus, and he does > not flog dead horses. > > [snip] > > Franz Really no, Franz. Judging by your posts, you just attempt to flog a dead horse. I suggested you a very simple task - determine with standard methods the circulation of vector in my diagram. Instead, you sweared me, you went away from thread - whatever instead a simple answer, is the circulation zero or not. If yes, you have a right to write what you wrote. If not, I am sorry to say, you not me are ignoramus. And you really try to reanimate the horse of relativity which has dead long time ago. You surely will not respond to this post, and even if you respond, there will be nothing to the point. Sergey