Path: ccsf.homeunix.org!ccsf.homeunix.org!news1.wakwak.com!nf1.xephion.ne.jp!onion.ish.org!honnetnews!news.gw.fukushima-u.ac.jp!news.tains.tohoku.ac.jp!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!priapus.visi.com!orange.octanews.net!news.octanews.net!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!news.glorb.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
From: selftrans@yandex.ru (Sergey Karavashkin)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,fj.sci.matter,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Gradient of potential function of dynamic field
Date: 27 Mar 2004 14:38:51 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <a42650fc.0403271438.7849c392@posting.google.com>
References: <a42650fc.0402011435.6e84feaa@posting.google.com> <a42650fc.0403051416.435747e1@posting.google.com> <slrnc4itjl.64.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403121443.467ac642@posting.google.com> <slrnc54m9t.985.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403181447.619936b7@posting.google.com> <slrnc5odcb.5t.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> <a42650fc.0403222157.33b67dc9@posting.google.com> <slrnc60ln7.7pq.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.177.112.246
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1080427132 26456 127.0.0.1 (27 Mar 2004 22:38:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 22:38:52 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: ccsf.homeunix.org fj.sci.matter:149

dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net (Bilge) wrote in message news:<slrnc60ln7.7pq.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>...
> Sergey Karavashkin: 
>  >dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net (Bilge) wrote in message news:<slrnc5odcb.5t.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net>...
>  >> Sergey Karavashkin: 
>  >>  >
>  >>  >No smokescreen. I have presented just the proof.
>  >> 
>  >>   Then write down the scalar function \Phi for which you assert
>  >> the relation, \nabla x (\nabla\Phi) = 0 does not hold. Don't
>  >> give me a bunch of interpretational mumbo-jumbo, just write
>  >> the scalar function.
>  >> 
>  >>  >Determine the circulation of vector in my diagram and after this state
>  >>  >curl(grad(phi)) = 0 identically.
>  >> 
>  >>   Write down the function \phi. I'm not going to sort through whatever
>  >> contortions you've gone through to get the wrong answer the hard way.
>  >> Just give me the function.
>  >>  
>  >>  >Still I see the smokescreen from your
>  >>  >side, but the wing is from mine - this is why you are suffocating with
>  >>  >your own smokescreen. Until you understand it, this will irritate your
>  >>  >eyes. Your, not mine. ;-)
>  >>  
>  >>   Write down the scalar function. Don't add any of your personal
>  >> interpretations or try to ``explain'' how I have to calculate
>  >> something to get your answer. Just give me a scalar function.
>  >> I can take a gradient and curl.
>  >
>  >First, this what interests you will be in our next paper which we will
>  >publish soon. Second, with such interest to Andrew and his attempts to
>  >join non-joinable, this question is seemingly to him. Third, it is
>  >strange for me to respond to a person who in the neighbouring post
>  >addmits all what I'm saying, but in the posts to me denies everything
>  >what I'm saying.
>  
>   Just post the scalar function for which you think the curl of
> its gradient in not zero. You don't need an article just to write
> down a function.


For you who even full proof don't accept as a grounds, just the
function will tell nothing. I understand your hurry, but please have a
patience and wait few days. ;-)

Sergey