US Justice: US 'Trials' of Pol. Refugee in Europe Fraudulent

by Dan Hajidah


- US Dept of Justice sources: US 'Trials' of Political Refugee in Europe 
Were Both Fraudulent
- US federal courts used illegally, to ban and slander dissident 
journalist and blogger Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs
- US federal judges send harassing e-mails to Europe over refugee from 
US court corruption;  US judges get European message, shove your e-mails 
"up the rectum"!

Originally published at Indymedia:

http://www.indymedia.nl/nl/2009/02/57826.shtml - or also at: 
http://mytinyurl.net/bee8e8

Original Indymedia version includes public domain photo of political 
refugee from US Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs at the EU Parliament


The new United States Attorney General under President Obama, Eric H. 
Holder Jr, is currently pondering the European request, that he bring 
criminal charges against the US group who have mounted several years of 
attacks against the US dissident writer Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, now 
living as an exile refugee from the US in Europe.

Dr Les Sachs, a US anti-corruption author and journalist, and himself a 
former award-winning US Department of Justice ('DOJ') employee, was 
forced to become a political refugee in Europe, after what DOJ sources 
describe as a scheme of extortion and threats of murder, that were 
funded by the Bush family friend, political financier, and famous author 
Patricia Cornwell, and involving some prominent US law firms in specific 
criminal acts against Sachs.

As described by the DOJ sources, these crimes of extortion and threats 
of murder - and other elements such as the illegal blocking of Sachs' 
political websites and blogs from the internet - took place as part of 
two US federal 'court proceedings' that were conducted in the state of 
Virginia, USA, where Dr Les Sachs lived before he was forced to escape 
to Europe.

The second of these two bizarre 'trials' was actually held in absentia, 
after Dr Les Sachs was already living in Belgium in a secret location, 
as a political refugee from the US government and judges - so in this 
second 'proceeding', the US judges merely e-mailed Sachs their new 
'court orders' against him, having no address to serve him with any 
papers. 

Sources within the US Dept of Justice itself - who were blocked from 
prosecuting the multiple crimes against Dr Les Sachs while Bush was 
President - detail how both of these US federal 'trials' against the 
dissident journalist Sachs were illegal and fraudulent, and in fact were 
not 'trials' at all.

According to DOJ staff, it is clear that not only were both of the 
trials against the refugee Sachs fraudulent and illegal, in fact all the 
US 'court orders' against Sachs are actually null and void.

These so-called 'trials' generated a series of US federal 'court 
orders' which imposed multiple bans on Dr Sachs' freedom to write and 
speak, the blocking of Sachs' European websites so that his sites cannot 
be found via Google and other search engines.

These US 'court orders' include various other bizarre elements, such as 
Sachs being supposedly 'required' to pay hundreds of thousands of 
dollars to two friends of US federal Judge Robert Payne, who supervised 
the first 'trial' against Sachs, and with Judge Payne and his friends 
all involved in a 'Freedom Foundation' which turns out not to exist.

According to the DOJ sources, the political financier Patricia Cornwell, 
paid these friends of federal judge Payne to threaten to torture Sachs 
to death in a US jail cell, and these friends of the judge used the 
threats of torture and murder to extort money out of Sachs, until Sachs 
was forced to escape to Europe to save his life.


This is published with a maximally open Creative Commons Licence:
<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"><img 
alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" 
src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/80x15.png"/></a><br/>This 
work is licenced under a <a rel="license" 
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons 
Licence</a>.


Significantly, no United States lawyer has ever yet been brave enough, 
to walk into a US courtroom and file a simple form to have these illegal 
'orders' against Dr Les Sachs to be officially nullified, because US 
lawyers are afraid of speaking about the evidence that US federal judges 
themselves are participating in criminal acts to have the dissident 
Sachs murdered. - US lawyers privately express fear of mafia-style 
revenge by US judges and their cronies.

The fear and cowardice of US lawyers, have frustrated those inside the 
US Department of Justice, who have long wanted to prosecute the crimes 
against Sachs, despite the political pressures resulting from Patricia 
Cornwell's million-dollar gifts to the George Bush family.

These sources at the US Department of Justice detail in specifics how 
both of the US 'trials' against Dr Les Sachs were fraudulent, and show 
some of the proof documents which make clear that both of these trials 
were fraudulent and illegal.

Some of these specific proof documents from US Department of Justice 
files, and US court and European police files, are already scanned and 
online at the website, 'Patricia Cornwell Court Trial Documents', which 
can be found here:

http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/

Just below are the details of internal US Department of Justice notes, 
as to why both of the United States federal court 'trials' against the 
dissident writer Dr Les Sachs are illegal and fraudulent, and why all 
the US 'court orders' against Sachs are actually null and void.


For general background on the history of the US government attacks on 
the dissident Sachs, and about the Patricia Cornwell - Dr Les (Leslie) 
Sachs legal cases, see the following, which provide accurate facts, in 
contrast to various false US media pieces, false Wikipedia articles, and 
even articles by dishonest US law professors, which have been publishing 
lies and hoaxes in order to hide the crimes of the US judges. Accurate 
journalism about these cases can be found here:


Two EU Writers Under Threat of Murder: Roberto Saviano and Dr Les Sachs

http://lombardia.indymedia.org/node/13581 - also at: 
http://mytinyurl.net/10e98


US Blocking Belgian Journalism Websites to Help Murder US Dissident in 
Brussels

http://www.indymedia.be/en/node/31259 - also at: 
http://mytinyurl.net/f35b4e


The attacks on the Jewish-heritage Dr Les Sachs, involve racist and 
anti-Semitic elements tied to Sachs' personal Jewish heritage. Sachs is 
non-Zionist, so 'Jewish leaders' leave Sachs abandoned, and remain in 
silence about the threats to have Sachs murdered.

Most centrally, the attacks on Sachs involve direct US government 
repression to silence Sachs' journalism, to shut down his blogs and 
block his writings from internet search results, and also the spread of 
media lies and hoaxes to destroy Sachs' reputation.

The US federal judges themselves have written long dishonest essays 
telling lies about Sachs and making personal insulting attacks on him, 
while ordering Google and other search engines to block Sachs' own 
European websites, in order to hide Sachs' responses to the lies by US 
judges.

Unable to have personal control over the refugee Sachs in his new home 
in Europe, the US judges exercise their hatred for Sachs by conducting a 
propaganda war against him, and trying to control the internet so that 
Sachs cannot make any statements to defend himself or to help protect 
his own life.

The blocking of Dr Les Sachs' European websites from worldwide internet 
search engines, helping to further the US threats to have Sachs 
murdered, is viewed by lawyers as a serious US violation of 
international laws and treaties. Sachs' main European website, though 
blocked, still exists at www (point) dr-les-sachs (point) be - Note: Do 
not put this site as a direct web page link, as any web page listing it 
may be blocked from internet search results.


US Dept of Justice sources: Why both 'trials' against the refugee 
dissident Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs are fraudulent, why all the US 'court 
orders' against Sachs are illegal, null and void

Following are the contents of internal US Department of Justice notes, 
as to why both of the US 'legal proceedings' against Sachs, and all 
their 'court orders' are completely invalid. These notes make reference 
to proof documents that are also held within the US Department of 
Justice, as well as European police files - And some of these documents 
are already scanned and online at the site, 'Patricia Cornwell Court 
Trial Documents', which can be found here:

http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/

As these notes of the US Department of Justice are presented, readers 
who wish to view the original documents and further analysis can consult 
the above-linked site.

No less than twelve separate reasons are listed, as to why both of the 
US 'legal proceedings' of Patricia Cornwell and the US judges and 
government, against the journalist Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, are fraudulent 
and invalid. Here is just the list, with full details for each of these, 
and links to proof documents, given below.

(1) Right near the beginning of her attacks on him, Patricia Cornwell 
committed clear felony perjury against Sachs on a main central issue, 
this makes all her proceedings against Sachs null and void.

(2) In the initial 'legal proceeding' of Patricia Cornwell against 
Sachs, Cornwell's lawyers arranged for an instant, completely illegal 
banning of Dr Les Sachs' freedom to write and speak, by prior collusion 
between US federal Judge Robert Payne and the Willcox & Savage law firm. 
This is illegal corruption and court fraud by Judge Robert Payne, and by 
Cornwell's lawyers at Willcox & Savage, so the whole proceeding is 
fraudulent, null and void.

(3) Lawyers Thomas H Roberts and Tim Schulte, posing as lawyers for 
Sachs, were actually working for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage, 
and threatened to have Sachs tortured and murdered. Thus the entire 
'legal proceeding' of Patricia Cornwell against Sachs is illegal and 
fraudulent, and the court orders from it null and void.

(4) Thomas Roberts and Tim Schulte, while working for Patricia Cornwell 
and posing as lawyers for Dr Les Sachs, also claimed to be part of a 
'Freedom Foundation' which does not exist, and Judge Robert Payne also 
spoke as salesman for this 'Freedom Foundation' of his corrupt criminal 
friend Roberts.

(5) The Patricia Cornwell case lawyer Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts - working 
for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage - himself committed multiple 
felonies of perjury while testifying as to the facts of the Patricia 
Cornwell case.

(6) There was no actual 'trial' in the first Patricia Cornwell legal 
case against Sachs which ended a few weeks after it started, with the 
announcement of a so-called 'settlement', which is clearly a complete 
fraud. The claim is that, after merely a few weeks of being 'sued by 
Patricia Cornwell', that somehow, magically and for the great benefit of 
Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers:
- that Dr Les Sachs 'suddenly' agreed to the permanent banning of his 
own freedom of speech and freedom of press for the rest of his life;
- that Sachs agreed to have his publishing company and writing career 
completely destroyed;
- that Sachs agreed to have his own personal reputation destroyed, and 
not to respond to lies that were published about him;
- that Sachs agreed to a lifelong personal enslavement to Judge Robert 
Payne, where Sachs could be personally jailed at any time under Judge 
Payne's whim; 
- and that Sachs agreed to spend the rest of his life paying several 
hundred thousand dollars plus 18 per cent interest, to Judge Payne's 
personal friend Thomas Roberts, and his partner Tim Schulte, two lawyers 
with a fraudulent 'Freedom Foundation' who were working for Patricia 
Cornwell.
This so-called 'settlement' is a clear fraud, utterly impossible, as the 
successful anti-corruption author Sachs had no assets to lose by a full 
trial and appeal of illegal 'orders'.

(7) In 2007, the same group of US federal judges in Virginia, the '4th 
Circuit', who held the first fraudulent proceeding as detailed above, 
held a second in absentia 'legal proceeding' against Sachs in Belgium, 
ordering the blocking of Sachs' sites from the internet search engines. 
This new legal proceeding was premised on 'enforcing' the orders of the 
first legal proceeding, which has been proven fraudulent as above, thus 
any proceeding based on that is also fraudulent and illegal, all of its 
'court orders' also null and void.

(8) It is clear that it is fraudulent for the US judges to hold a 'legal 
proceeding' against a victim whom they threaten to illegally jail and 
murder if he returns to the country to argue his case, and where they 
are also threatening to disbar or otherwise personally harm any US 
lawyer who would dare to represent this victim who took refuge in 
Europe.

(9) For the 2007 'legal proceeding', Sachs was never even served with 
legal papers. The US judges and lawyers merely resorted to sending Dr 
Les Sachs their new fraudulent 'court orders' by e-mail.

(10) The 2007 in absentia trial against Sachs, to block his websites and 
to enable the completion of his murder, was held by the same 4th Circuit 
US federal judges who are named in a standing Appeal by Sachs as legal 
parties to the ongoing case.

(11) Dr Les Sachs had already published extensive journalism about 
corruption by both US 4th Circuit district and Appeals judges, and how 
these judges are involved in threatening to murder him. These judges 
must not hold any proceedings about matters in which they are personally 
involved as objects of the journalism of Dr Les Sachs. They were 
obligated to have any new case involving Sachs transferred to another 
Circuit altogether.

(12) The US 2007 'legal proceeding' against Dr Les Sachs, ordering the 
blocking of his European websites from readers around the world, so that 
Sachs can be slandered and killed, and the world deprived of reading his 
political journalism, is a criminal act in direct violation of 
international treaties both on the subject of terrorism and on open 
control of the internet.


Now for the full details of the above:


DOJ Notes - Why the 4th Circuit 'Trials' of Sachs with Patricia Cornwell 
are Illegal Frauds, All 'Court Orders' upon Sachs Null and Void


(1) Right near the beginning of her attacks on him, Patricia Cornwell 
committed clear felony perjury against Sachs on a main central issue, 
this makes all her proceedings against Sachs null and void.

Scan of the court transcript page proving the actual act of Patricia 
Cornwell engaged in felony perjury against Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs:

http://mytinyurl.net/1


And scans of the extortion letter and court papers about which Patricia 
Cornwell is lying, that prove she is committing perjury:

http://mytinyurl.net/bc9c6e

http://mytinyurl.net/505b1b


(2) In the initial 'legal proceeding' of Patricia Cornwell against 
Sachs, Cornwell's lawyers arranged for an instant and illegal banning of 
Dr Les Sachs' freedom to write and speak, by prior collusion between US 
federal Judge Robert Payne and the Willcox & Savage law firm. Apparently 
there was a successful bribery offer to Payne by Conrad Shumadine of 
Willcox & Savage. Shumadine was already a friend of 'Judge Robert Payne 
is my name, Federal bribery is my game.'

Judge Robert Payne was appointed to office by Patricia Cornwell's 
personal friend of many years, the first US President George Bush, to 
whose family Cornwell has given millions of dollars.

This illegal ban on Dr Les Sachs' freedom of speech and freedom of the 
press, was imposed by phone call of Judge Payne, a few minutes after 
Sachs got the legal papers, which Sachs didn't even have time to finish 
reading. It was farce theatre as well as illegal, carefully timed and 
arranged by collusion between Judge Robert Payne and Willcox & Savage 
and the process-servers, who delayed serving the legal papers on Sachs 
till just before Judge Payne's phone call.

Willcox & Savage had also arranged in advance to publish nationwide 
media articles attacking and smearing Sachs, and meanwhile Judge Payne 
had instantly ordered that Sachs faced jail if he dared to respond to 
the false media. - So lawyers and the public were discouraged from 
helping Sachs or supporting him, given the lies in the media and on the 
internet. Sachs was even banned from saying that his freedom of speech 
had been banned.

Patricia Cornwell's lawyer Shumadine was such a bold liar, that he even 
used some of the false media articles that he himself had planted, as 
'evidence' to support the banning of Sachs' freedom of speech and 
freedom of the press.

This is illegal, clear corruption and court fraud by Judge Robert Payne, 
and by Cornwell's lawyers at Willcox & Savage, so the whole proceeding 
with Payne is fraudulent, null and void.

For more information on Conrad Shumadine and Willcox & Savage, their 
relationship with Judge Robert Payne, and their role with Patricia 
Cornwell in the attacks on Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/708092


(3) With Dr Les Sachs instantly under threat of jail if he said anything 
about any crimes against him, Judge Robert Payne and Patricia Cornwell's 
lawyers at Willcox & Savage, then quickly moved to the next phase of 
court fraud and extortion.

Judge Payne quickly assigned one of his own personal friends to 
'represent' Sachs, a Virginia lawyer named Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts, aided 
by another lawyer, originally from Germany, and with neo-Nazi and anti-
Semitic views, Tim Schulte (occasionally 'Timothy Schulte').

Multiple proofs of fraud and extortion show that Tom Roberts and Tim 
Schulte were really working for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage.

When Sachs realised that Roberts and Schulte were working directly for 
Cornwell, Roberts and Schulte threatened to have Sachs jailed and 
tortured to death in jail under Judge Payne's power, if Sachs dared to 
denounce them or try to 'fire' them.

The threats to have the Jewish Sachs tortured and murdered were 
apparently a matter of great sadistic pleasure for Patricia Cornwell, 
and this pleasure was great enough that Cornwell was willing to pay 
Willcox & Savage several hundred thousand dollars, for the pleasure of 
extorting a Jew, taking his human rights away, and threatening to 
torture him to death.

Since the lawyers Roberts and Schulte were actually working for Patricia 
Cornwell and Willcox & Savage, and as Roberts and Schulte threatened to 
have Sachs tortured and murdered, the entire 'legal proceeding' of 
Patricia Cornwell against Sachs is illegal, fraudulent, and the court 
orders from it null and void.

For Patricia Cornwell's public boasting that she can successfully murder 
people when she wishes - from Vanity Fair magazine - see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/7ee992


For court transcript of Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts under oath, talking about 
murdering Dr Les Sachs, and Roberts' other crimes in the Patricia 
Cornwell case being exposed, see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(4) Thomas H Roberts and Tim Schulte, while working for Patricia 
Cornwell and posing as lawyers for Dr Les Sachs, also claimed to be part 
of a 'Freedom Foundation' which does not exist, and Judge Robert Payne 
also spoke as salesman for this 'Freedom Foundation' of his criminal 
friend Roberts.

Roberts had spent ten dollars for a corporate name registration for his 
fake 'foundation', but did no filings with the Internal Revenue Service 
or state foundation authorities, as required by US law. Yet Roberts has 
used his fake foundation to obtain money and defraud people, in felony 
violation of federal statutes. - For their fake 'foundation', Roberts 
and Schulte have used the name similar to an actual registered 
Foundation, the 'FreedomWorks Foundation' of billionaire Steve Forbes, 
though the fake 'Freedom Works Foundation' of Roberts and Schulte and 
Judge Payne has no connection.

Roberts and Schulte also used the name of law school Dean Rodney 'Rod' 
Smolla, their former teacher, as also involved in this fraudulent 
foundation. Smolla is now Dean of Judge Payne's own law school - the 
circles of Virginia corruption are nicely small.

Under the doctrine of 'fraud upon the court', with Judge Payne and Tom 
Roberts and Tim Schulte, all claiming that Roberts and Schulte are in a 
'Freedom Foundation' that does not exist, and claiming that this 
'Foundation' was 'helping' Dr Les Sachs - It is clear that the entire 
legal proceeding and all 'court orders' from this proceeding are 
fraudulent, null and void.

Roberts and Judge Payne were so bold in their fraud with their fake 
'Freedom Foundation' that they have put this fraud on the internet, in 
multiple documents, and in court transcript. Here is a court transcript 
where Thomas Roberts is cornered into essentially acknowledging that his 
fake 'foundation' is indeed an illegal fraud:

http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(5) The Patricia Cornwell case lawyer Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts - working 
for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage, though falsely claiming to 
'represent' Cornwell's victim Dr Les Sachs - himself committed multiple 
felonies of perjury while testifying as to the facts of the Patricia 
Cornwell case.

Under oath and on the witness stand, Tom Roberts committed unmistakable 
perjury, including perjury claiming he had never seen the Patricia 
Cornwell extortion letter threatening book-burning against Sachs, even 
though it is at the centre of the legal files in the original Patricia 
Cornwell 'legal case'.

Roberts also commits felony perjury about the sticker on Dr Les Sachs' 
novel, which was about Patricia Cornwell's threats to burn the books of 
a Jewish author. Instead of the truth, Roberts lies under oath, and 
tries to spread the Cornwell group's hoax that Sachs' sticker was making 
'plagiarism accusations', which in fact were never made by Sachs.

As Thomas H Roberts is proven to be himself a perjurer in his attacks on 
Sachs, regarding events where he falsely claimed to be 'representing' 
Sachs in the first legal case with Patricia Cornwell, the Patricia 
Cornwell legal cases against Sachs are also proven to be fraudulent, 
null and void, along with the 'court orders' issued against Sachs.

To see the original Patricia Cornwell extortion letter against Sachs, 
threatening the book-burning of a Jewish man's books, see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/bc9c6e


To see scans of original Patricia Cornwell US court filings demanding 
the book-burning of a Jew's books, see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/505b1b


To see the scan of the official US courthouse copy of the book cover of 
Dr Les Sachs' novel, with the sticker making reference to Patricia 
Cornwell's book-burning threats - this scan completely debunking the lie 
and hoax of media articles, falsely claiming that this book sticker was 
about 'plagiarism accusations' - see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/015e6d


To see the official court transcript where the Cornwell case lawyer 
Thomas H Roberts commits multiple counts of felony perjury, thus proving 
that the Patricia Cornwell 'legal proceedings' against Dr Les Sachs are 
fraudulent, null and void, see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(6) There was no actual 'trial' in the first Patricia Cornwell legal 
case against Sachs (and no 'trial' in the second US legal case either). 
The first 'legal proceeding' ended a few weeks after it started, with 
the announcement of a so-called 'settlement', which is clearly a 
complete fraud.

The 'settlement agreement' is not even signed by the victim, Dr Les 
(Leslie) Sachs, but only signed by US federal Judge Robert Payne, and by 
lawyers who are both working for Patricia Cornwell, Conrad Shumadine and 
Thomas 'Tom' Roberts.

Previously to being attacked by Patricia Cornwell, Dr Les Sachs had been 
an anti-corruption author and journalist for many years, as well as a 
political activist. At the time of these attacks, Sachs had no 
significant assets, and nothing to lose by a full trial and an appeal of 
illegal 'court orders'.

Nonetheless, according to this absurdly false 'settlement', the Cornwell 
lawyers and federal judge, all claim what is literally impossible. They 
claim that, after merely a few weeks of being 'sued by Patricia 
Cornwell', that somehow, magically and for the great benefit of Patricia 
Cornwell and her lawyers:
- that Dr Les Sachs 'suddenly' agreed to the permanent banning of his 
own freedom of speech and freedom of press for the rest of his life;
- that Sachs agreed to have his publishing company and writing career 
completely destroyed;
- that Sachs agreed to have his own personal reputation destroyed, and 
not to respond to lies that were published about him;
- that Sachs agreed to a lifelong personal enslavement to Judge Robert 
Payne, where Sachs could be personally jailed at any time under Judge 
Payne's whim; 
- and that Sachs agreed to spend the rest of his life paying several 
hundred thousand dollars plus 18 per cent interest, to Judge Payne's 
personal friend Thomas Roberts, and his partner Tim Schulte, two lawyers 
with a fraudulent 'Freedom Foundation' who were working for Patricia 
Cornwell.

It is literally impossible for Sachs to have 'agreed' to all this, as 
there is no benefit to him to 'agree' to have his freedom of speech 
banned and his reputation and publishing company destroyed, and yet pay 
great sums of money for the rest of his life to Judge Payne's friend 
Roberts with a fraudulent 'Foundation' that does not exist.

The only thing that explains this fraudulent 'settlement', is what is 
also evident from the documents and court transcripts, that the 
extortionists Roberts and Schulte, working for Patricia Cornwell, 
threatened to have Dr Les Sachs illegally jailed, and tortured to death 
in a jail cell. That is the only possible basis of this utterly 
fraudulent 'settlement' benefiting only Patricia Cornwell and the US 
lawyers and judges.

It is thus clear from the documents and court transcripts, that since 
the entire so-called 'settlement' of the first Patricia Cornwell legal 
case is an impossible fraud, consequently the entirety of both of the 
Patricia Cornwell 'legal proceedings' against Sachs are frauds, with all 
'court orders' against Sachs null and void.

Here is a US court transcript where the entire fraudulent settlement 
scheme of the Cornwell lawyers is exposed, with Cornwell case lawyer 
Thomas Roberts on the witness stand, and rather well torn apart by a 
brave Dr Les Sachs, making a last stand inside of the USA, before being 
forced to escape from America in order to save his life:

http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(7) In 2007, the same group of US federal judges in Virginia, the '4th 
Circuit', who held the first fraudulent proceeding as detailed above, 
held a second in absentia 'legal proceeding' against Sachs in Belgium, 
where he has been recently living as a political refugee. After his 
arrival as a refugee in Europe in 2004, Dr Les Sachs became an 
increasingly influential journalist about US legal corruption, and 
Sachs' journalistic influence around the world and among US citizens, 
had come to be seen as a major threat to the US regime.

Moreover, Patricia Cornwell was increasingly angry about the accurate 
biography of Patricia Cornwell which Dr Les Sachs had published on the 
web, informing many people about the scandals and sordid details of 
Patricia Cornwell's past life, details which US corporate media had 
agreed to hide as a reward for Cornwell's money contributions to the 
Bushes and other US political figures.

The US federal judges were also increasingly angry at Dr Les Sachs for 
his journalism on US legal corruption. Perhaps angriest of all was 
dominant US 4th Circuit Appeals Judge J Harvie Wilkinson III, who missed 
being appointed to be Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, as a result 
of an article published by Sachs, right at the very moment when 
Wilkinson was being interviewed by President Bush for the Supreme Court 
vacancy.

So Wilkinson and the other 4th Circuit judges, all stung badly by 
Sachs' anti-corruption journalism, communally resolved to participate in 
a new scheme to try to have Sachs destroyed and killed, even in his new 
refugee home in Europe.

The US judges no longer have direct power over Dr Les Sachs, given that 
he was able to successfully escape alive from US territory. But the CIA 
and US government and judges, and Patricia Cornwell's own lawyers, they 
did develop a plan to try to 'finish off' the anti-corruption journalist 
Sachs, by holding yet another fake and fraudulent 'legal proceeding' 
inside of America.

So in 2007, the Patricia Cornwell group and the US judges, with the 
direct involvement as well of the CIA and the President Bush 
administration, held this second 'legal proceeding' against Sachs, in 
order to secure a new set of 'court orders' which:
- ordered Google and the major search engines (all US-based) to close 
down Sachs' political blog, to shut down search engine access to Sachs' 
political websites and journalism;
- gave Cornwell-linked media companies a new basis to spread lies and 
slanders against Sachs based on this new 'legal proceeding';
- enabled the completion of the murder of Dr Les Sachs, because the 
websites by which Sachs was defending and protecting himself, can no 
longer be found via internet searches, and it is now much easier for US 
agents or for Patricia Cornwell to finish the murder of Sachs, with 
search engines hiding the truth about Sachs and how he came to be a 
refugee in Europe.

This new legal proceeding was premised on 'enforcing' the orders of the 
first legal proceeding, which has been proven fraudulent as above, and 
thus any proceeding based on that - such as the 2007 'legal proceeding' 
ordering the blocking of Sachs' sites from the internet search engines, 
is also fraudulent and illegal, all of its 'court orders' also null and 
void.


(8) As seen above, there is clear proof that Dr Les Sachs faced illegal 
jailing, and torture to death in a jail cell, with the US government 
being unwilling to protect Sachs from harm. Under President Bush, US 
authorities refused to prosecute the criminal acts proven here, such as 
Patricia Cornwell and Thomas Roberts committing clear perjury, and 
threatening to have Sachs tortured to death in a jail cell.

See here for the exposure of Thomas Roberts' crimes in fraudulently 
posing as the lawyer for Dr Les Sachs while threatening to murder him:

http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


Also, it is very clear from thousands of e-mails in the evidence files, 
that US lawyers have feared mafia-style revenge from US judges, if they 
dare to represent Dr Les Sachs, or file any US legal papers regarding 
the criminal acts done against him.

Some of these e-mails are from US lawyers who were immediately disbarred 
(i.e., lost their right to practice law, by order of the judges), after 
those lawyers had tried to speak out against US legal corruption. These 
witnesses confirm that US lawyers are indeed under mafia-style threat 
and menace, if they dare to represent a client like Dr Les Sachs.

It is clear that it is fraudulent for the US judges to hold a 'legal 
proceeding' against a victim whom they threaten to illegally jail and 
murder if he returns to the country to argue his case, and where they 
are also threatening to disbar or otherwise personally harm any US 
lawyer who would dare to represent this victim who took refuge in 
Europe.

Thus, with the 2007 'trial' held in absentia against Dr Les Sachs while 
he was living as a refugee in Belgium, it is clear that this 'legal 
proceeding' is illegal and fraudulent, all its orders null and void.


(9) For the 2007 'legal proceeding', Sachs was never even served with 
legal papers. The US judges and lawyers have no address for Sachs, and 
Sachs now lives under security at secret locations in Belgium. The US 
judges and lawyers merely resorted to sending Dr Les Sachs their new 
fraudulent 'court orders' by e-mail, with Sachs continually responding 
that these e-mails were criminal harassment.

It is noteworthy that the e-mails from the US judges taunting Sachs, 
with how they were blocking his websites from the internet to help 
murder him, came right from the official US courthouse e-mail accounts.

To the harassing e-mails he received from the US 4th Circuit judges in 
2007, Dr Les Sachs finally e-mailed a response to these US judges which 
seemed to deter them from directly harassing him by e-mail any further. 
Sachs wrote back to the judges: